Marks of the Fascist, Tacky, Insatiable Beast
As we approach the 100-day milestone (yes it's only been that long) a sadistic, repressive regime increasingly reviled by its own people defiantly hurtles on - arresting judges, crushing dissent, abducting migrants, citizens, pregnant mothers, sick toddlers - while grotesquely cashing in on its atrocities with tawdry meme coins, black-tie dinners, loyalty pins and OMFG 2028 hats. We are become government by chaos, cruelty, greed - Liberace backed by the Stasi, a nation of gulags filled with gold (plated) gimcracks. SAD.
Historically, the 100-day milestone is seen as an ad-hoc national Rorschach test on a new president - or in this case führer - with pundits viewing the political landscape and drawing rational, data-based conclusions. Amidst our current mayhem, though, the only clear verdict is, "There's some seriously dystopian things going on." Polls show an administration (sic) that's lost the support of much of its populace, with the mad king's approval ratings underwater on virtually every issue, including the economy and immigration. Happily, he keeps losing in court, even before Trump-appointed judges: Thank you independent judiciary and the ACLU. Nobody wants to visit his despotic third-world shithole of a country anymore, mouthy Democrats like Jasmine Crockett won't stop saying mean things about him - to his rants about keeping us safe from criminals she invariably notes, "I haven’t seen anybody with a rap sheet that looks like the president’s” - and despite a lame "ONLY THE WEAK WILL FAIL!” rallying cry, he's crashed the economy with "this most imbecilic and destructive trade war in the history of the world."
The "holy-shit-that's-dumb" spectacle of his disastrous "Liberation Day" tariffs offered grim quick proof of his staggering ineptness: What could match the mad dissonance of $6 trillion instantly obliterated in a market meltdown as he bragged of "billions and billions of dollars pouring into our country"? He confused trade deficits with the national debt, made up numbers - a 25% tariff on cars would raise $100 billion, no wait, $600 billion - and wildly flip-flopped. It turns out he based his "formula" on research its author said he got "very wrong" and advice by a fictional "Ron Vara" conjured up by Peter Navarro, who Elon dubbed "dumb as a sack of bricks" before later apologizing to bricks. The crowning moment of "chickenfuckery": Nobody collected any money at ports packed with goods due to a "technical glitch." The Economist on the "complete drivel" of a trade policy by an idiot duped by his own MAGA echo chamber: "Ifyou failed to spot America being 'looted, pillaged, raped and plundered by nations near and far,' congratulations: You have a firmer grip on reality than the President of the United States."
Luckily for him, a flunky says, "He’s at the peak of just not giving a fuck anymore." Great news for the nuclear codes! Thus does the old mad king spend over a quarter of his time at his crappy golf courses - cue many Nero cartoons - at a cost of more than $3 million a game. Asked about his weekend as the economy burned, he gloated, "I won (at golf) - it's good to win." We wouldn't know. Meanwhile, he rants, spews, babbles, out of the loop. He's said to considering drone strikes on Mexican drug cartels. He wished "Happy Easter to all," even the "despicable and unAmerican radical left lunatics (who) hate our country so much" and the "WEAK and INEFFECTIVE judges allowing this sinister attack so violent it will never be forgotten!" On Earth Day, focusing on the important things and celebrating now that "we finally have a president who follows science," he announced he's putting up two, new, beautiful, yuge "top of the line" flag poles at the White House: "They needed flag poles for 200 years. It was something I've often said, you know, they don't have a flag pole per se. It's going to be two beautiful poles."
It's also, as always, "a great time to get rich." Which is why he's as always, if stupefyingly - how much money is enough? - still grifting, a tacky hucksterism that recalls a 2016 observation Trump is "the Republican Party’s answer to Liberace." Both bitchy, germaphobe divas, Trump was (sort of) friends with the king of glitz, a master of sequined suits, candelabras on the grill of his Cadillac and gold-and-chandelier-drenched Las Vegas home - akin to Trump Tower, dubbed "the Liberace of buildings" - but impressively topped by a faux Sistine Chapel ceiling featuring himself. His mantra: ‘Too much of a good thing is wonderful." And so to Trump's new scam, a $TRUMP memecoin that netted him millions, joined by $MELANIA, before predictably crashing. Now he's offering “the most EXCLUSIVE INVITATION in the World," where top buyers can attend an "unforgettable Gala DINNER.” "Own $TRUMP! ARE YOU IN?” shrieks the promo with exploding confetti like Better Call Saul ads. "The competition is fierce!" Sen. Chris Murphy: "This is the most brazenly corrupt thing a President has ever done. Not close.”
Still, the scams and bling keep coming. Recently, FCC Chair Brendan Carr posted a photo of himself wearing a gold lapel pin of Dear Leader squinting up like he did at an eclipse, a cultish image prompting the NYT to boldly suggest it "raises questions" - like, given its resemblance to once-ubiquitous Mao Tse-Tung pins, "Is Trump the most communist leader we've ever had?" Following in the tradition of dictators past - Libyan students had to quote Gaddafi, Turkmenistan's gold statue rotated to the sun, North Koreans wear Kim Jong-un badges and sing Friendly Father - Trump has worn an aptly cartoonish version of himself, and myriad pins online go for as little as $3.97. His relentless merch machine hawks this for $25, "gold-plated," reportedly of a base metal used for cheap doodads that's toxic: "Tacky and cheap in every way. The Trump brand." Also, "The SS had their Death Head, MAGA has their Shit Head." The White House denies rumors pin-wearing is mandatory, but adds it's A-ok to "show support for the greatest President in history," also nice little family you have and how sad if anything happened to them.
More grandiose gestures hover. Trump is said to be considering planning a much-dreamed-of, $100-million "great celebratory military parade," just like other big bad guys, to mark his June 14 birthday, which coincides with the Army's 250th anniversary. Cue marching soldiers, armored vehicles, tanks ripping up the streets of D.C, and what waste and fraud? Also, the guy losing faster and sooner than any president in history continues trolling about maybe running (or crawling by then) for a third term. "They say I can't run again - that's the expression," he jabbered in February. "There are methods which you could do it. A lot of people want me to do it." Just in case, he's already cashing in with yet another crappy red cap - more trashy, deadly marks of the beast - this one declaring Trump 2028, which costs $50 and promises to "make a statement," presumably about evil tinpot wannabe dictators who just will not STFU. His store is also selling $36 t-shirts: "Trump 2028 (Rewrite the Rules). The future looks bright!" Except - per Billy Roach's "Facts owe" - for most of the denizens of a now-ravaged, on-the-edge America.
Back in the real world, away from the bling and lies and frenzied delusion, Trump and his accomplices are feverishly committing ever more outlandish atrocities against everyone who isn't them, especially if brown-skinned. Last month, citing "the dynamic nature of enforcement operations," the Justice Dept (sic) quietly gave ICE agents the power to conduct searches without warrants of people’s homes if based on "a reasonable belief" they suspect targets of being "an Alien Enemy." (Good god almighty they deserve hell just for their twisted desecration of language itself). "As much as practicable," agents should follow legal procedures and get warrants before "contacting an Alien Enemy,” the memo generously adds. “However, that will not always be realistic or effective in swiftly identifying and removing Alien Enemies," so sometimes they might just be whisked in the middle of the night into murderous gulags in foreign countries like Abrego Garcia and over 200 Venezuelans who happen to have tattoos while Kristi De Goebbels primps and smirks, but hey, too bad, so sad, at least now we're legally covered.
Under such dubious rubrics, Trump's rabid cabal of fascists and lickspittles have eagerly taken on the task of dismantling burdensome due process. Slimy Marco Rubio has defended detaining and seeking to deport over 300 innocents, including Tufts graduate student Rumesya Oztur, for mere political speech he doesn't agree with, gloating, "Every time I find one of these lunatics, I take away their visa. It's just that simple." Except when not: In another shitshow, he also revoked visas for South Sudanese after their country allegedly refused to accept one of their own named Nimeri Garang; in fact, Rubio mistakenly sent them DRC citizen Makula Kintu who told the U.S. he wasn’t from South Sudan but they wouldn't listen, insisting his argument was "legally irrelevant." Defying multiple court orders, Rubio is reportedly still sending “alien enemy” victims to El Salvador if they're over 14 - "What about those deadly Venezuelan toddlers?" - and praising their evil, profit-making alliance as “an example for security and prosperity, though U.S. law bars financial support for “units of foreign security forces," torturous or no.
Meanwhile Nazi Press Barbie says they're "exploring legal pathways" to disappear U.S. citizens, but only "heinous criminals (who) have broken our laws repeatedly," maybe like with 33 felony convictions? Tulsi Gabbard says gangs are foreign terrorists "invading" us 'cause they're working with the Venezuelan government to make America weaker and browner so they don't deserve any due process, though experts and 17 of 18 U.S. intelligence agencies call the charge "ludicrous"; in response she told Congress they're all deep-state liars who "twisted and manipulated" the (fictional) evidence "to undermine the president's agenda," she "fully supports" the (imaginary) assessment they're foreign terrorists acting with Maduro's support, they're thus subject to arrest and removal as alien enemies, and in what one skeptic calls "the fastest mole hunt in the history of mole hunts,"
she's already referred the leaking "deep-state criminals" to the DOJ for possible prosecution and, obviously, conveniently, their removal to CECOT or some similarly merciless location. Whew. Stalin really could have used her.
And still the ICE rampage escalates. In New Orleans, they just arrested, held incommunicado and deported two mothers, one pregnant, and their three U.S.-citizen children - 7, 4 and a 2-year-old girl with metatastic cancer - at a routine immigration hearing, even as the girl's father was frantically petitioning the court to keep her in the country; agents admitted the move was a ploy to get him to turn himself in. For once, there was blowback: A horrified judge, Trump-appointed yet, ordered a hearing based on his
"strong suspicion the government just deported a U.S. citizen with no meaningful process.” We hope he knows multiple others have met the same fate - U.S. permanent residents detained at DHS offices, delivering paperwork, in naturalization interviews, a deported family with a 10-year-old U.S. citizen with brain cancer, a deported Cuban wife of a U.S. citizen with whom she shares a baby daughter. Her distraught husband: "They separated a girl from her mother. They killed a mother, a father, and the future of a girl while she was still alive." So much winning.
On Friday, the fascist-abuse-of-state-power-meter got turned up still more when FBI agents in Wisconsin arrested Milwaukee Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan, 65, for allegedly helping an immigrant evade arrest by ICE in her courtroom by letting him leave by another door. Though they caught him later, an outraged Ka$h Patel clamored, "We believe Judge Dugan intentionally misdirected federal agents away from the subject, an illegal alien" - oh how they love their racist slurs - for which she faces two federal felony counts of obstruction and concealing an individual. Defense attorneys called the action "very, very outrageous"; Attorney-General (sic) Pam Bondi, who took bribes to let both Jeffrey Epstein and Trump U. skate, went on Fox News as usual to declare the judiciary "deranged" and darkly warn, "We will find you." FactPac called on the Florida Bar to review Bondi's conduct and consider her disbarment for being "a lawless Attorney General." Finally, observers wondered, "What stage of fascism does arresting judges mark?" and speculated, "Her Nuremberg trial will be the best one."
Because the authoritarian goal is to harass or intimidate anyone who seems able to thwart their power, the regime's targets have also included labor unions, disgruntled or fired federal workers threatened with criminal penalties if they speak up - "Und Blabbermouths vill be zhot" - and victims of former anti-discrimination agencies like Equal Employment perversely flipped in service of today's hatred, like Barnard College professors asked to declare if they're Jewish and have encountered anti-Semitism or "unwelcome discussions." Given the sinister Red-Scare tactics and horrific damage inflicted by "a guy who eats a big bowl of contempt for breakfast each morning," it's hard to fathom the freakish juxtapositions at work, to conflate the cheesy clown and huckster with the foul, dark, implacably broken sociopath, devoid of empathy, grace, any saving human virtue. Jamelle Bouie posits a personality so driven by the need to dominate, to demonstrate "mastery over his perceived enemies," to "trample over those who don’t belong in his America," that he "will always want more...There must be a loser or else there is no Trump."
"When historians reflect on this regime," Robert Reich muses, "cruelty will be the word most used to define it." Also emblematic, others suggest: Sadism, stupidity, corruption, the vital task of "seeing people for who they really are." Recently, comedian Larry David wrote a blistering piece parodying Bill Maher's account of a dinner with Trump, who he called "gracious and measured." David's My Dinner With Adolf begins when, in the spring of 1939, a letter arrives "inviting me to dinner (with) the world’s most reviled man, Adolf Hitler.” "Everyone said don't go, he's a monster," but he decides "we need to talk to the other side - even if it (has) annexed other countries and committed unspeakable crimes against humanity." At dinner, Hitler laughs and tells jokes, like about his dog having diarrhea; he beams, "'Hey, if I can kill Jews, Gypsies and homosexuals, I can kill a dog!' which got the biggest laugh of the night...Suddenly he seemed so human. Like this was the real Hitler...We're not all that different." Leaving, he tells the furher, "I'm so thankful i came. Although we disagree on many issues, it doesn’t mean we have to hate each other." Then, "I gave him a Nazi salute and walked out into the night.”
'Sick': Trump Marks Earth Day With Layoff Notice for Hundreds of EPA Staff
As defenders of the planet marked Earth Day with pledges to fight the destructive agenda of U.S. President Donald Trump, some green groups on Tuesday responded with alarm to the administration's plans for layoffs at the Environmental Protection Agency.
Several news outlets obtained the notice that EPA Assistant Deputy Administrator Travis Voyles sent on Monday evening to staffers with the Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights as well as regional EJ divisions, warning of a reduction in force (RIF) that will cut 280 employees and reassign about 175 others this summer.
"This action is necessary to align our workforce with the agency's current and future needs and to ensure the efficient and effective operation of our programs," Voyles said. "With this action, EPA is delivering organizational improvements to the personnel structure that will directly benefit the American people and better advance the agency's core mission of protecting human health and the environment."
The Washington Postnoted that "the news comes months after the agency placed 171 of the office's employees on administrative leave and then reversed course, reinstating dozens of regional employees in offices across the country," and as decision-makers at the EPA have been weighing how to implement Trump's executive order targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).
"It's a gut punch but long expected," said an employee who was put on leave in February and spoke with the Post on the condition of anonymity. "Announcing a RIF of the EJ program on the eve of Earth Day is sick and shows exactly who they are."
Joyce Howell, executive vice president of the American Federation of Government Employees Council 238 that represents over 8,400 EPA workers nationwide, toldReuters that "decimating our agency and environmental justice workforce goes against our oath to protect human health and to keep our planet healthy and habitable for future generations."
In a Tuesday statement, Sierra Club executive director Ben Jealous similarly said that "the Trump administration is determined to destroy the stated mission of the Environmental Protection Agency to protect human health and the environment. All of us deserve to have clean air to breathe, safe water to drink, and be protected from toxic pollution."
"Instead, the Trump administration is selling us out to corporate polluters by actively working to slash clean air and water protections and laying off critical environmental justice staff," he continued. "The people that Donald Trump is putting out of work are hardworking, dedicated civil servants who have devoted their careers to protecting our clean air and water and securing a livable future for us all. The only people who will benefit from their firings are corporate polluters."
Chitra Kumar, a former official with the impacted EPA office who's now managing director at the Union of Concerned Scientists' Climate and Energy Program, said in a statement that "the layoff notice sent to employees claimed their dismissal would 'better advance the agency's core mission of protecting human health and the environment,' which is the height of hypocrisy given that these staffers are working to reduce pollution and toxins in the communities suffering the most harm."
"Scientific data shows that, due to historic and ongoing injustices, communities overburdened by polluting industries, smog-forming traffic, and contaminated waterways and soil are predominantly low-income, Black, Brown, and Indigenous. Exposure to consistently higher levels of pollution increases the risk of asthma, heart and lung ailments, cancer, and even death," said Kumar, who took aim at EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin.
"Zeldin and the Trump administration continue to focus on propping up the profits of coal, oil, and gas companies and other big polluters who take advantage of every loophole available at the expense of public health. This is about all of us, our children, and grandchildren," she stressed. "If Administrator Zeldin goes forward with this destructive move, he will be responsible for ending decades of work intended to help set right the harmful legacy of pollution in overburdened communities in a handout to big polluters."
Kumar pointed out that "this is also part of the Trump administration's larger ongoing strategy to dismantle EPA and its core functions and undermine its very mission, which is to help keep all people in America safe. In the time ahead, Zeldin is expected to launch a repeal, or 'no enforce' order, for a host of science-backed environmental regulations and engage in a wholesale 'reorganization' of the agency, including gutting the Research and Development Office that produces science undergirding EPA decisions."
As criticism of Zeldin and Trump's plans for the EPA mounted, people protested against the administration in communities across the country. Aru Shiney-Ajay, executive director of the youth-led Sunrise Movement, said in a statement that "Donald Trump, backed by fossil fuel billionaires, is waging a full-scale assault on the very lifesaving protections that Earth Day was created to demand."
While Republicans currently control the White House and both chambers of Congress, some elected Democrats used Earth Day to advocate for policies that would protect the planet. Multiple senators
used the day to promote bills that would protect the Pacific and Atlantic oceans from offshore oil and gas drilling.
US Consumer Sentiment Falls to Second-Lowest Level in 70+ Years—And It's Likely to Get Worse
Consumer sentiment in the United States continued its sharp plunge this month under President Donald Trump as Americans grew increasingly concerned about the prospect of a job-destroying recession in the near future—fears fueled in large part by the administration's erratic tariff policies.
The University of Michigan's Surveys of Consumers, released Friday, found that U.S. consumer sentiment plunged 11% at the start of April compared to last month, a decline that was "pervasive and unanimous across age, income, education, geographic region, and political affiliation."
That's according to the survey project's director, Joanne Hsu, who said that "sentiment has now lost more than 30% since December 2024 amid growing worries about trade war developments that have oscillated over the course of the year."
Friday's assessment shows that overall consumer sentiment has fallen to its second-lowest level since the early 1950s.
"Consumers report multiple warning signs that raise the risk of recession: expectations for business conditions, personal finances, incomes, inflation, and labor markets all continued to deteriorate this month," said Hsu. "The share of consumers expecting unemployment to rise in the year ahead increased for the fifth consecutive month and is now more than double the November 2024 reading and the highest since 2009."
"This lack of labor market confidence," Hsu added, "lies in sharp contrast to the past several years, when robust spending was supported primarily by strong labor markets and incomes."
"President Trump isn't executing an economic agenda, he's piloting a kamikaze mission."
Lindsay Owens, executive director of the Groundwork Collaborative, said in a statement that "the scariest part of today's plunging consumer sentiment numbers is that we might be looking at the high-water mark."
"The president's reckless trade policies have roiled markets, shattered retirement accounts, and halted shipping orders. We could be looking at price spikes, shortages, and even a recession in the weeks and months to come," said Owens. "Worst of all, while consumers are bracing for impact, Congress is gutting the safety net they'll need to rely on if the economic devastation continues. President Trump isn't executing an economic agenda, he's piloting a kamikaze mission."
Trump himself has admitted that his tariffs, which he partially paused for 90 days earlier this week, could spark a recession.
The Wall Street Journal reported that the president "told advisers that he was willing to take 'pain'" and "privately acknowledged that his trade policy could trigger a recession but said he wanted to be sure it didn't cause a depression."
While Goldman Sachs withdrew its recession forecast after Trump announced the partial tariff pause, Moody's chief economist Mark Zandi toldFortune that he took "no solace in the president’s announcement to delay the reciprocal tariffs for 90 days."
"Even if the administration can cut a few deals during this period, it will leave us with significantly higher tariffs, which are tax increases on American consumers and businesses," said Zandi. "This will weigh heavily on the U.S. and global economies and likely result in a recession."
"To what end?" he asked. "There will be no boost to investment in the U.S. The trade deficit will be no smaller. And there won't be any reliable increase in government revenues. It is impossible to fathom why the world is being put through all this unnecessary drama."
'We Have Been Working Against That': Trump and Johnson Dump Cold Water on Millionaire Tax Hike
U.S. President Donald Trump indicated in an interview published Friday that he's unlikely to push congressional Republicans to include a tax hike on millionaires in their sprawling reconciliation bill, saying he doesn't "want it to be used against me politically."
Trump's comments to TIME magazine came a day after he told reporters in the Oval Office that raising the statutory income tax rate on people who earn more than $1 million a year would be "very disruptive, because a lot of the millionaires would leave the country." (The notion of millionaire tax flight, often cited by Republicans as a reason not to raise taxes on the rich, has been repeatedly debunked.)
In recent weeks, pro-Trump figures such as former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon and a small number of Republicans in Congress have floated the idea of slightly raising income taxes for millionaires, suggesting the move would help counter progressive attacks on Trump and his billionaire-stocked Cabinet as a manifestation of the United States' descent into oligarchy.
"This guts the AOC-Bernie 'oligarchy tour,'" Bannon toldThe Washington Post earlier this week. "Politically, it's game, set, match—it's a no-brainer. This would destroy the Democrats."
But Trump told TIME that he's concerned about political backlash stemming from any tax increase on millionaires, even as he acknowledged it "doesn't make that much of a difference" to the rich.
"I would be honored to pay more," said Trump, whose organization was convicted in 2022 of a long-running tax fraud scheme. "But I don't want to be in a position where we lose an election because I was generous."
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) toldFox News earlier this week that he "would not expect" a millionaire tax hike to wind up in the GOP reconciliation package, which is expected to extend the 2017 Trump-GOP tax breaks and enact an additional $1.5 trillion in tax cuts—paid for in part by slashing Medicaid, federal nutrition assistance, and other programs.
"We have been working against that idea," Johnson added. "I'm not in favor of raising the tax rates because our party is the group that stands against that traditionally."
"The real thing that's going on here is that Republicans are feeling the pressure of our messaging. They're cutting basic service programs like Medicaid and SNAP to give tax cuts to billionaires."
Proposals floated by Republican lawmakers and discussed in Trump's inner circle in recent days include allowing the top marginal tax rate to revert to 39.6%—the level prior to enactment of the 2017 tax cuts—next year and establishing a new top marginal rate of 40%, which would do nothing to tax mega-billionaires like Elon Musk, whose wealth is mostly stock that's only taxed when sold.
The millionaire tax hike proposals have drawn vocal opposition from big business, with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce—the nation's largest corporate lobbying group—joining a recent letter rejecting any proposed tax increase on millionaires.
David Kass, executive director of Americans for Tax Fairness, told Common Dreams in an interview Friday that "even if they did put something like this in" the final reconciliation package, "it's really important to remember that the bill would still be overwhelmingly skewed to the rich."
"The real thing that's going on here is that Republicans are feeling the pressure of our messaging," said Kass. "They're cutting basic service programs like Medicaid and SNAP to give tax cuts to billionaires."
Morris Pearl, chair of the Patriotic Millionaires, told Common Dreams in an emailed statement that "while we are supportive of efforts to raise the income tax rate on millionaires, if past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior, we'll believe Republicans are serious about protecting working people from an unfair tax burden when we see it."
"As they prepare their bill for an early summer passage," said Pearl, "we fully expect Republicans to once again sacrifice everything and everyone at the altar of tax cuts for their ultra-wealthy benefactors at the expense of working people."
'Fascism Getting Turned Up' as Trump FBI Arrests Wisconsin County Judge
Federal agents arrested a sitting Wisconsin judge on Friday, accusing her of helping an undocumented immigrant evade arrest after he appeared in her courtroom last week, FBI Director Kash Patel said on social media.
In a since-deleted post, Patel said the FBI arrested 65-year-old Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan "on charges of obstruction."
"We believe Judge Dugan intentionally misdirected federal agents away from the subject to be arrested in her courthouse... allowing the subject—an illegal alien—to evade arrest," Patel wrote. "Thankfully, our agents chased down the perp on foot and he's been in custody since, but the judge's obstruction created increased danger to the public."
It is unclear why Patel deleted the post.U.S. Marshals Service spokesperson Brady McCarron and multiple Milwaukee County judges confirmed Dugan's arrest, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. McCarron said Dugan is facing two federal felony counts: obstruction and concealing an individual.
U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi discussed the arrest during a Friday morning Fox News appearance in which she opined that judges like Dugan are "deranged" and believe they "are beyond and above the law."
The Journal Sentinel reported that Dugan "appeared before U.S. Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Dries during a brief hearing in a packed courtroom at the federal courthouse" and "made no public comments."
Dugan's attorney, Craig Mastantuono, told the court that "Judge Dugan wholeheartedly regrets and protests her arrest," which "was not made in the interest of public safety."
The FBI had reportedly been investigating allegations that Dugan helped the undocumented man avoid arrest by letting him hide in her chambers.
Wisconsin state Rep. Ryan Clancy (D-19) said in a statement Wednesday that "several witnesses report that [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] did not present a warrant before entering the courtroom and it is not clear whether ICE ever possessed or presented a judicial warrant, generally required for agents to access nonpublic spaces like Judge Dugan's chambers."
Clancy continued:
I commend Judge Hannah Dugan's defense of due process by preventing ICE from shamefully using her courtroom as an ad hoc holding area for deportations. We cannot have a functional legal system if people are justifiably afraid to show up for legal proceedings, especially when ICE agents have already repeatedly grabbed people off the street in retaliation for speech and free association, without even obtaining the proper warrants.
While the facts in this case are still unfolding, it's clear that actions like Judge Dugan's are what is required for democracy to survive the Trump regime. She used her position of power and privilege to protect someone from an agency that has repeatedly, flagrantly abused its own power. If enough of us act similarly, and strategically, we can stand with our neighbors and build a better world together.
Prominent Milwaukee defense attorney and former federal prosecutor Franklyn Gimbel called Dugan's arrest "very, very outrageous."
"First and foremost, I know—as a former federal prosecutor and as a defense lawyer for decades—that a person who is a judge, who has a residence who has no problem being found, should not be arrested, if you will, like some common criminal," Gimbel told the Journal Sentinel.
"And I'm shocked and surprised that the U.S. attorney's office or the FBI would not have invited her to show up and accept process if they're going to charge her with a crime," he added.
Julius Kim, another former prosecutor-turned-defense lawyer, said on the social media site X that "practicing in Milwaukee, I know Judge Hannah Dugan well. She's a good judge, and this entire situation demonstrates how the Trump administration's policies are heading for a direct collision course with the judiciary."
"That being said, given the FBI director's tweet (since deleted), they are going to try to politicize this situation to the max," Kim added. "That sounds an awful lot like weaponizing the [Department of Justice], doesn't it?"
The National Women's Law Center (NWLC) was among the groups that condemned Dugan's arrest.
"This arrest is an escalation in the Trump administration's ongoing effort to dismantle the rule of law and consolidate power," NWLC director of nominations and democracy Alison Gill said in a statement. "These aggressive attacks on judges are dangerous."
"President [Donald] Trump has repeatedly shown contempt for the courts and our Constitution, refusing to accept their authority, defying court orders, and encouraging public criticism of due process," Gill added. "The FBI's apparent decision to make an example of Judge Dugan is part of a broader and deeply alarming agenda to silence dissent, incite fear, and erode the very institutions that protect our rights. The Trump administration's lawlessness is a threat to everyone in this country."
Responding to Dugan's arrest, U.S. Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) said on the social media site Bluesky: "The Trump [administration] has arrested a judge in Milwaukee. This is a red alert moment. We must all rise up against it."
'Another Day, Another Cover-Up,' Rights Group Says as IDF Releases Report on Medics' Killing
The Israel Defense Forces' report on the killing of 15 paramedics in Gaza last month was "sure to lead to increased demands for an independent investigation," said one journalist for Sky News, which recently released an extensive account of the incident that experts and advocates have called a potential war crime.
The IDF said it had found "several professional failures, breaches of orders, and a failure to fully report the incident" that took place on March 23, when Israeli troops opened fire on a convoy of vehicles that included ambulances, killing the 15 rescue workers.
But officials claimed that there was "no attempt to conceal the event" and the report suggested the firing of a deputy commander for providing an "inaccurate report" and the reprimanding of a commanding officer should satisfy the international outcry over the incident, after which United Nations and Palestinian Red Crescent officials discovered the medics' bodies and their crushed rescue vehicles had been buried in a shallow mass grave.
"Is this meant to be a joke?" said Palestinian writer and poet Mosab Abu Toha after the IDF announced the commanders would be fired and reprimanded. "How is this supposed to help the children and families of these medics? ...These war criminals should be arrested and handed over to the [International Criminal Court] for due legal processing."
The IDF report found that six out of 15 Palestinians killed "were identified in a retrospective examination as Hamas terrorists," but did not produce evidence to support the claim; Sky News, which released its investigation on on Friday, also did not find evidence.
The report also claimed that the army decided to "gather and cover the bodies to prevent further harm and clear the vehicles from the route in preparation for civilian evacuation"—an explanation for the buried bodies and ambulances.
As Common Dreamsreported earlier this month, the IDF's claim that soldiers "did not randomly attack" the convoy but rather fired on suspected "terrorists" in "suspicious vehicles" was refuted by video evidence from the phone of one of the medics who was found in the mass grave—believed to be Refaat Radwan.
The video showed a convoy of clearly marked ambulances and fire truck, with headlights and flashing lights on—contradicting the IDF's claim that the vehicles were driving with their lights off.
Despite the video evidence, the IDF report said there was "no evidence to support claims of execution" and accused those who have made such accusations of "blood libels."
The Sky News report released Friday found that Israel's claim that the medics were not fired at from a close distance was false and that expert analysis of Radwan's cellphone video determined shots had been fired from as close as 12 meters away
Palestinian-American policy analyst Yousef Munayyer said that in the case of the medics' killing, "video evidence exposed [the IDF's] lies forcing this flimsy effort mascarading as accountability so they can sweep it under the rug."
Israel is able to repeatedly attack civilians and aid workers and claim that their deaths were accidental, Munayyer suggested, because "western media is willing to believe as fact initial Israeli narratives around atrocities."
The Israeli probe found "professional failures," said former Human Rights Watch executive director Kenneth Roth, but the IDF "doesn't seem to have examined the rules of engagement, approved by senior officials, that permit killing before clear identification of a combatant."
The killing of the paramedics underscored the "atmosphere of impunity" in Gaza, said one Israeli policy analyst.
"What we know is that we cannot trust the Israeli [military]. Unless The New York Times would have gotten hold of that video clip, I don't think that we would know the truth," Akiva Eldar told Al Jazeera. "It would be another cover-up."
Human rights lawyer Geoffrey Nice told Al Jazeera that the IDF report "invites many questions that it will be difficult, I suspect, for the [Israeli military] to answer."
"For example, [there is] the proposition that six of these people were Hamas, presumably members of Hamas on active [military] service, not people who might have been associated with Hamas in some way. No documentary evidence at all is identified [for that]," he told the outlet.
Breaking the Silence, a group made up of Israeli veterans of the IDF who speak out against Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories, said the report was "riddled with contradictions, vague phrasing, and selective details."
"We all remember when the IDF claimed that the ambulances emergency lights weren't on—and then we saw the footage proving otherwise. Not every lie has a video to expose it, but this report doesn't even attempt to engage with the truth," said the group.
"Another day, another cover-up," Breaking the Silence added. "More innocent lives taken, with no accountability."
Unions Cheer After Judge Halts Trump Order on Federal Workers' Collective Bargaining Rights
"Today's court order is a victory for federal employees, their union rights, and the American people they serve," said the head of the National Treasury Employees Union.
Labor unions representing federal workers celebrated on Friday after a U.S. district judge blocked President Donald Trump's March executive order intended to strip the collective bargaining rights from hundreds of thousands of government employees.
The National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) swiftly took action over what union national president Doreen Greenwald called "an attempt to silence the voices of our nation's public servants," filing a lawsuit in in U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia.
Judge Paul Friedman, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton, granted a preliminary injunction on Friday, blocking implementation of the executive order (EO), which aimed to restrict workers' rights under the guise of protecting national security.
CNNreported that during a Wednesday hearing, Friedman questioned "Trump's motive in issuing the order" and "the administration's contention that certain agencies have national security as their primary function, citing the National Institutes of Health, Federal Emergency Management Agency, and Department of Agriculture."
Also reporting on the hearing earlier this week, Politicodetailed:
Attorneys representing the NTEU mentioned that the Trump administration, after issuing the EO, immediately sued an NTEU-affiliate union in Kentucky and Texas—federal districts dominated by Republican appointees.
Shortly after Friedman's hearing Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Danny Reeves, who is hearing the government's case in Kentucky, denied a request from a local NTEU chapter to postpone oral arguments that are scheduled for Friday. Reeves is an appointee of President George W. Bush. A decision in those cases could affect the NTEU's lawsuit before Friedman.
Still, the NTEU welcomed Freidman's Friday decision to halt what it called an "anti-union, anti-federal employee executive order" while also preparing for the Trump administration to "quickly appeal."
"Today's court order is a victory for federal employees, their union rights, and the American people they serve," said Greenwald. "The preliminary injunction granted at NTEU's request means the collective bargaining rights of federal employees will remain intact and the administration's illegal agenda to sideline the voices of federal employees and dismantle unions is blocked."
"NTEU will continue to use every tool available to protect federal employees and the valuable services they provide from these hostile attacks on their jobs, their agencies, and their legally protected rights to organize," she pledged.
The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), the nation's largest federal workers union, also applauded Friday's news.
"AFGE congratulates our union siblings at NTEU on their important victory in the D.C. District Court today," said national president Everett Kelley. "This ruling is a major step toward restoring the collective bargaining rights that federal employees are guaranteed under the law."
Kelley added that "AFGE looks forward to arguing our own case against this unlawful executive order in federal court. We are confident that, together, these efforts will secure the full relief federal employees deserve—and send a clear message that no administration is above the law."
GOP Wants $27 Billion for Trump's Golden Dome 'Fantasy' While Working to Gut Working-Class Safety Net
"$27 billion for a golden defense dome, yet Republicans want to cut Medicaid," wrote one observer. "Vote accordingly in 2026."
As Republicans in Congress push forward with a sweeping tax and spending plan that could be be paid for in part by deep cuts to Medicaid and to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the GOP plans to add a defense package to that bill which will include "an initial $27 billion boost" for the Golden Dome desired by U.S. President Donald, according to Thursday reporting from Reuters.
Trump has said he wants an "Iron Dome for America"—something akin to Israel's Iron Dome anti-missile defense. In a speech earlier this year he referred to it as a "Golden Dome."
Experts who spoke to NPR recently said that building a Golden Dome would be more complicated than Israel's Iron Dome for multiple reasons. Dylan Spaulding, a senior scientist with the Union of Concerned Scientists, earlier this week called the Golden Dome idea a "complete fantasy."
According to Reuters, which cited "a document" and a congressional aide, the $27 billion would be a part of a $150 billion defense package Republicans plan to introduce. "It will be part of Trump's sweeping tax cuts bill, which will cut taxes by about $5 trillion and add approximately $5.7 trillion to the federal government's debt over the next decade," per the outlet. The measure, if passed, will also fund the construction of 14 warships and increase homeland security spending.
"The $27 billion investment in Golden Dome will fund the building of more missile interceptors and the purchase of Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) antiballistic missile batteries, according to the congressional aide. THAAD is made by Lockheed Martin," the defense contractor, Reuters reported.
According to reporting from the outlet last week, billionaire "Elon Musk's SpaceX and two partners have emerged as front-runners to win a crucial part of the Golden Dome program that would track incoming missiles."
Bob Peterson, a senior research fellow for strategic deterrence at the right-wing think tank the Heritage Foundation, applauded the move. Peterson shared Reuters' reporting and wrote on Friday: "This is an important start to building Golden Dome. I sincerely hope this passes so that missile defense will protect all Americans from our adversaries."
Not everyone is enthusiastic about the spending.
One observer wrote on social media: "Golden Dome missile defense shield? WTF. $27 billion for a golden defense dome, yet Republicans want to cut Medicaid and Social Security. Vote accordingly in 2026."
"More than 180 companies are interested, but Musk's Space X just so happens to be the 'front-runner' for the contracts," wrote Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas), reacting to earlier reporting from Reuters about Musk's potential involvement in the project. "Shut this corrupt deal down. No cuts to Medicaid and Social Security to pay for more Musk contracts."
GOP Activist-Turned-Federal Prosecutor Sends 'Threatening' Letters to Medical Journals
One doctor and public health advocate called on editors to "join together and publicly renounce this as yet more thinly guised anti-science political blackmail."
Reports of letters that an interim U.S. attorney has sent to several medical journals in the United States prompted a show of solidarity from the U.K.-based Lancet on Friday, with the publication denouncing "the harassment of journals" and warning it "comes amid wider radical dismantling of the USA's scientific infrastructure."
The letters, containing questions about the academic journals' bias, come a year after Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said he hoped to prosecute medical journals and accused the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM)—which condemned President Donald Trump's response to the coronavirus pandemic in 2020—of "lying to the public."
The letters from interim U.S. Attorney Edward Martin, who has previously been accused of using his office to target Trump's critics, are "an obvious ruse to strike fear into journals and impinge on their right to independent editorial oversight," said The Lancet.
NEJM is one of at least four medical journals that have received the correspondence from Martin recently. According toMedical Professionals Reference, the peer-reviewed journal CHEST, which is published by the American College of Chest Physicians, received a letter on April 14 with the following questions and a demand that editors respond by May 2:
- How do you assess your responsibilities to protect the public from misinformation?
- How do you clearly articulate to the public when you have certain viewpoints that are influenced by your ongoing relations with supporters, funders, advertisers, and others?
- Do you accept articles or essays from competing viewpoints?
- How do you assess the role played by government officials and funding organizations like the National Institutes of Health in the development of submitted articles?
- How do you handle allegations that authors of works in your journals may have misled their readers?
Martin also asked the editors whether "publishers, journals, and organizations with which you work are adjusting their method of acceptance of competing viewpoints."
Psychiatrist Eric Reinhart of Northwestern University posted the letter on X last week and asked what kinds of "competing viewpoints" Martin—former chair of the Missouri Republican Party and president of the right-wing Eagle Forum Education and Legal Defense Fund—might want to see a medical journals about respiratory health.
"'Is sarcoidosis actually bad?" Reinhart suggested sardonically. "Should trans people get treatment for chest infections? Is ivermectin the cure for lung cancer? Why shouldn't Joe Rogan perform lung transplants? So glad RFK Jr. is in charge to ensure these important views get airtime."
Reinhart urged other scientific journal editors to speak out against threats they receive from the Trump appointee.
Adam Gaffney, a pulmonary and critical care physician at Cambridge Health Alliance in Massachusetts and former president of Physicians for a National Health Program, also called on journal editors to "join together and publicly renounce this as yet more thinly guised anti-science political blackmail."
"It is yet another example of the Trump administration's effort to control academic inquiry and stifle scientific discourse—an administration, it warrants mentioning, that has embraced medical misinformation and pseudoscience to reckless effect," Gaffney toldMedPage Today last week.
The letters have been received by the medical journals as Kennedy angered medical experts and families with his recent comments about autism, claiming that "most cases now are severe"—a claim not backed up by science. Kennedy has also recently downplayed measles outbreaks in the United States before finally admitting this month that the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine is the best defense against the disease.
The Trump administration has also cut funding for health agencies, prompting concern that it is sabotaging the country's ability to produce high-quality biomedical research as it has for generations.
NEJM responded to Martin ahead of the May 2 deadline, telling the prosecutor the journal uses "rigorous peer review and editorial processes to ensure the objectivity and reliability of the research we publish. We support the editorial independence of medical journals and their First Amendment rights to free expression."
Eric Rubin, editor-in-chief of the publication, told The New York Times, "Our job is to evaluate science and evaluate it in an unbiased fashion."
"The questions seem to suggest that there's some bias in what we do—that's where the vaguely threatening part comes in," Rubin said.