SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER

Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

* indicates required
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Opinion
Climate
Economy
Politics
Rights & Justice
War & Peace
Clergy members link arms outside Newark ICE facility
Further

We Shall Not Be Moved Chap. 784

Three days after ICE goons arrested Newark Mayor Ras Baraka for doing his job and exercising his First Amendment right to protest the regime's illegal disappearing of his constituents, about 50 faith leaders gathered at the same facility Monday to link their arms, block the entrance, demand information on conditions inside and declare, "This is not acceptable" - after which they too were set upon by goons. One minister: "This is the enactment of a police state."

in February, ICE was awarded a contract with the GEO Group to operate its formerly shuttered, 1,100-bed Delaney Hall, in an industrial area outside Newark, as a for-profit detention center for immigrants facing deportation. Despite widespread opposition and a still-pending lawsuit by the city over compliance with multiple permits, ICE began delivering detainees there on May 1. Last Friday, three New Jersey members of Congress went to the site and, acting on their legal right to conduct Congressional oversight, sought a tour of the facility. Because the current regime no longer cares about anyone's legal rights, they were banned.

They were joined by Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, also acting on his legal right to protect his constituents, and also banned. After a scuffle with ICE and police thugs, he was arrested, held for five hours and charged with trespassing. According to New Jersey acting Barbie Attorney Alina Habba, Baraka was "repeatedly told" he had to leave; according to Baraka, that's bullshit. The House members there - Reps. LaMonica McIver, Bonnie Coleman, Rob Menendez - said the thugs had escalated the situation and the claim was "a lie," "absurd," "scary," and another effort of a regime "lying at all levels (to) intimidate people in this country."

Given that effort is ongoing, ICE’s parent agency Homeland Security issued a statement charging House members "stormed the gate and broke into the detention facility" despite its barbed-wire-topped entrance. Calling the presence of the lawmakers "a cheap political stunt," they also charged they had put law enforcement, staff and detainees "at risk," with a spokesperson hysterically shrieking, "Who do they want released from Delaney Hall? The child rapists, murderers, drug traffickers, MS-13 gang members or known terrorists?" even though none of the detainees have been convicted, or often even charged, with any crimes.

The members of Faith in New Jersey, Faith in Action, Pax Christi and other clergy who came Monday in solidarity to Delaney cited that "immigration narrative that's been very criminalizing" as part of their protest. Right-wing media coverage of their presence confirmed the charge: A Fox News headline proclaimed Agitators Clash With Police As Clergy Members Descend - armed, they might have added, with their liturgical stoles reading, "Side With Love." Other headlines called the gathering "an interfaith prayer service" and described them linking arms, standing shoulder to shoulder, praying for detainees and singing Which Side Are You On?

Spread across the entrance, they also demanded transparency from officials, seeking the names of detainees, the conditions - beds, food, medical care - and who's profiting from them. Said one, "A lot of human rights violations are happening across the U.S., and this one is not going to be any different." At around 5 p.m., as employees began driving out the gate, things again escalated. In a surreal scene, beefy police and ICE agents started shoving and muscling protesters away; skirmishes broke out as they resisted, entreated, chanted, yelled, then finally struggled back together, re-linked arms and began singing, "We Shall Not Be Moved."

At least two people were arrested; dystopian videos showed a phalanx of police manhandling one woman in a hijab and hauling her away as others struggled to stop them. But those who remained were steadfast. "We will continue to show up," said one. "Think of the names of all the people who have been disappeared from your community...We'll be here as long as it takes until people start to realize that this is not acceptable." "I'm here because my Universalist faith tells me to love the Hell out of this world," said the Rev. Anya Sammler of the Universalist Unitarian Congregation in Montclair. “And what we are seeing in this world is Hell."

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

SEE ALL
Flaring from Calcasieu Pass.
News

How Louisiana Advocates Are Continuing to Fight the Trump-Backed LNG Boom

Louisiana advocates and their allies are not giving up in their fight to stop the liquefied natural gas buildout that threatens the health and well-being of Gulf Coast communities—not to mention the stability of the global climate—even as the Trump administration doubles down on its commitment to expanding LNG infrastructure.

In a briefing on Tuesday, community members, local advocates, and international campaigners shared how they would continue to push back against Venture Global, an LNG company that has amassed a record of ecosystem destruction and air pollution violations at its currently operating Calcasieu Pass export terminal in Cameron Parish, Louisiana. Despite this, the Trump administration's Department of Energy granted conditional approval for the company’s nearby Calcasieu Pass 2 (CP2), undoing the pause that the outgoing Biden administration had placed on it and other LNG approvals as it considered the public interest ramifications of LNG exports.

Yet Gulf Coast campaigners, who are used to dealing with a lax regulatory environment at the state level, were not defeated.

"Anybody who reports here in Louisiana regularly understands that we've never been protected by our regulatory environment. Never," Anne Rolfes, who directs the Louisiana Bucket Brigade, told reporters. "And so we always have had to take matters into our own hands, and we have protected ourselves against enormous companies."

Misadventure Global

One key strategy that the Louisiana Bucket Brigade and others have used to get around the regulatory rubber stamping of bad actors is to raise public awareness of how the companies turning coastal Louisiana into a sacrifice zone really operate.

Case in point is Venture Global. Rolfe and John Allaire—a 40-year veteran of the oil and gas industry who lives next door to the Calcasieu Pass terminal—laid out its short but extensive record of environmental violations and unethical business practices.

Even before the original Calcasieu Pass began exporting, in January 2022, it had to clear a space for tankers to access the facility.

"It's understood that this is a volatile fuel to lock into, that you don't want to rely on a fuel that Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump control."

"They pumped hundreds of thousands of cubic yards of black viscous sludge from their marine berth out into the front of the Gulf of Mexico," Allaire said. "And that was the first indication of what was to come with Venture Global."

Since it began operating, the company has added air, noise, and light pollution to the water pollution that has devastated local fisheries.

Allaire has taken hundreds of videos and photos of flaring incidents.

"The light pollution is unbelievable," he said. "At night, I can literally read a book when the flares are going, and I'm over a mile away from their flare stacks."

Allaire's observations are backed up by the official record. In June 2023, the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality sent Venture Global a compliance order detailing over 2,000 air permit violations from its first 10 months of operation, Allaire said. The company has yet to resolve the complaint, and the state sent them a warning letter in March covering their 2024 and 2025 rule-breaking.

The company also has a history of failing to report its flares and other excess emissions to the Department of Environmental Quality as required by the Clean Air Act.

If they reported and then investigated their violations, "that would enable them to really understand what's happening at their facility so that they could prevent future problems," Rolfe said. "They absolutely aren't doing that."

In March, the Louisiana Bucket Brigade and the Habitat Recovery Project notified Venture Global of intent to sue the company over Clean Air Act violations at its Calcasieu Pass facility.

But the environmental groups aren't the only ones suing Venture Global. The company stretched its commissioning phase—during which it is considered still in the process of establishing itself and can sell its products to the highest bidder rather than honoring its contracts—for three years and three months, beginning normal operations just this April.

"This is absolutely off from the industry norm," Rolfe said.

Now, other major fossil fuel companies, including Shell and BP, are pursuing arbitration claims against Venture Global for breach of contract. Investors have joined a class-action lawsuit against it, saying it violated federal securities law by misrepresenting its prospects.

Yet Venture Global has huge ambitions for the region. In addition to Calcasieu Pass and CP2, it wants to build three other export terminals in coastal Louisiana and more than triple its capacity from 30 million tons per annum (MTPA) of liquid gas—already over a quarter of the 88 MTPA exported by the U.S. exports in 2024—to 104 MTPA.

"As a review, they're flouting the Clean Air Act. They've manipulated the commissioning phase. They're being sued by everybody they've done business with. Is this a company that our country and our state should put such faith in?" Rolfe asked.

She answered her own question: "Of course, our answer is no."

Stall Tactics

Another strategy the Louisiana Bucket Brigade and their allies seek to employ is to delay Venture Global's ambitions long enough for the economic reality of the LNG boom to catch up with it.

In addition to the approval of CP2, Australian company Woodside announced on Monday that it had approved a Louisiana LNG project worth $17.5 billion. Yet the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis concluded in April that the massive growth in LNG capacity would exceed dwindling demand within two years.

"It's understood that this is a volatile fuel to lock into, that you don't want to rely on a fuel that Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump control. So people are trying to get off of gas," Rolfe said.

"The economics are going to catch up with them. I just want it to be before they destroy the coast of Louisiana."

This means that LNG companies like Woodside and Venture Global are behaving "like a kid in a candy store," Rolfe continued. "That kid, unchecked, will eat so much, they'll throw up. I think the same is true with this industry. Unchecked, it will do itself harm."

The key is therefore to stall the buildout long enough that many projects become infeasible. This tactic has worked for frontline communities during the first Trump administration, Rolfe said. Through a combination of public pressure, records requests, and legal action, community advocates were able to delay the construction of a plastic plant proposed by the Chinese company Wanhua Chemical U.S. Operation, LLC, which would have released the World War 1-era nerve gas phosgene into the already pollution-burdened St. James Parish.

The economic outlook for the plant had always been "dubious" Rolfe said, and eventually the company gave up on trying to build it.

"They could have gotten approval and gotten on their way within a month. But our suit and then our constant presence and making them table things and so forth, drew it out and let the economics catch up with them," Rolfe said.

Rolfe added that the gas industry has similarly gotten ahead of itself.

"They're greedy, right? They want to grab all the candy they can, and the economics are going to catch up with them. I just want it to be before they destroy the coast of Louisiana."

Very Risk Business

Another strategy to slow down the building of new LNG facilities like CP2 is to target the one thing, in addition to permits and funds, that they can't move forward without: insurance.

Insurance is one sector in which the economic impact of the climate crisis is already being felt, as Ethan Nuss, senior energy finance campaigner at Rainforest Action Network, explained.

For example, major insurer Chubb earns $1.5 billion a year in premiums from the fossil fuel industry, which was already canceled out early this year with the $1.5 billion in pre-tax losses they took from the Los Angeles wildfires. On a local level, some insurers have pulled out of Louisiana all together to avoid insuring against climate-fueled extreme weather events.

"Once they are really educated about the permit violations and the legal risks and the true risk landscape that they're facing by taking on this client, many of them are very concerned."

"This is not a time to build something like CP2 that would deepen the climate crisis," Nuss said.

Because insurers are on the books for both fossil fuel projects and the damage for climate disasters, and because many of them have climate and human rights policies, they are vulnerable to growing pressure from the climate movement to drop the oil and gas clients costing them so much money.

RAN in February published the names of the major insurers for Venture Global's Calcasieu Pass, which it obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request. These included Chubb subsidiary ACE American Insurance Company, AIG subsidiary National Union Fire Insurance Co., Allianz, Swiss Re, AXA, and Tokio Marine subsidiary Houston Casualty Company.

"That has kicked off a global effort to reach out to those insurers and begin to educate them about what is happening in Southwest Louisiana, the impacts from Calcasieu Pass, and what associated risks they're facing," Nuss said.

As a result of these efforts, Swiss Re has agreed to meet with the fishing community of Southwest Louisiana, to talk about the "devastating impacts on their livelihoods" from Calcasieu Pass' operations.

"Often with these global financial institutions, they aren't fully aware of what's really happening on the ground. That client is maybe just another line on the spreadsheet. But once they really start hearing the stories, once they are really educated about the permit violations and the legal risks and the true risk landscape that they're facing by taking on this client, many of them are very concerned," Nuss said.

Nuss hopes that, once fully informed, insurers would decide any project of Venture Global's is a "very risky business that they don't want to be involved in."

SEE ALL
Frank Bisignano, U.S. President Donald Trump's nominee to be commissioner of the Social Security Administration
News

By Confirming Bisignano, Senate GOP Greenlights 'DOGE Destruction of Social Security'

Defenders of the Social Security Administration sounded the alarm on Tuesday after U.S. Senate Republicans banded together to confirm President Donald Trump's pick to lead the federal agency, former financial services executive Frank Bisignano.

The new SSA commissioner—confirmed with a 53-47 vote along party lines—has described himself as a "DOGE person," referring to Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, which is led by billionaire Elon Musk.

"Elon Musk and Donald Trump, with the quiet help of Frank Bisignano, have spent the last few months taking a chainsaw to Social Security," said Nancy Altman, president of the advocacy group Social Security Works. "This vote was an opportunity for the Senate to reject the decimation of Social Security, and demand that Trump nominate a commissioner who will stop the bleeding. Instead, every Senate Republican just signed off on the DOGE destruction of Social Security."

Bisignano "is a Wall Street CEO with a long history of slashing the companies he runs to the bone, including massive layoffs," she noted. "He is also a liar. He claims he was not involved in all the chaotic and destructive changes at the Social Security Administration: the hollowing out of the agency, the stealing of our most sensitive data, the harmful and poorly rolled out policy changes, their sudden reversals, and more. However, there are well over a dozen long-serving civil servants, identified by a brave whistleblower, who can validate that he is lying."

Altman warned that "with Bisignano's increased power as a confirmed commissioner, he will accelerate the destruction of our Social Security system. One ray of hope is that the DOGE henchmen running Social Security have reversed course on some of the biggest cuts in the face of massive public outrage. They know how popular Social Security is with voters of all parties."

"Together, we can save Social Security from Trump, Musk, and Bisignano," she added. "It's going to take millions of people in the street raising our voices together, saying hands off our Social Security."

American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) president Lee Saunders similarly said that "the Senate just escalated threats to Social Security" by confirming a billionaire CEO who "has spent his career catering to Wall Street elites."

"Bisignano could have stood up for working families and retirees by opposing efforts to roll back Social Security services, shut down offices, and lay off thousands of workers. Instead, he promises to provide more of the same failed, destructive leadership we have seen so far at Social Security," Saunders pointed out, also flagging his "DOGE person" remarks.

"Their playbook is clearly to break Social Security so they can justify further cuts and privatization," the labor leader stressed, vowing that AFSCME members "are keeping up the fight to protect our freedom to retire with dignity."

Richard Fiesta, executive director of the Alliance for Retired Americans, called the confirmation vote "deeply troubling to millions of current and future retirees who rely on the guaranteed benefits they paid for and earned through a lifetime of work."

"Mr. Bisignano's testimony before the Senate, along with his long career in the finance and tech sectors, provides no reassurance that he understands—let alone prioritizes—the needs of older and disabled Americans," said Fiesta. "We remain alarmed by the risk that he will support privatization schemes or replace essential SSA workers with AI systems, which could undermine the quality and accessibility of services."

Newly elected Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin also blasted the Senate GOP for confirming "a Wall Street stooge and self-proclaimed 'DOGE person' who wants to help Donald Trump and his shadow president Elon Musk gut the program."

"Just like Trump and Musk, Bisignano will gladly put Social Security on the chopping block to line the pockets of billionaires and special interests," Martin added, arguing that the men put the benefits of 73 million people at risk.

Members of the Senate Democratic Caucus, including Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), also warned of the danger posed by the new commissioner. In Schumer's words, "The nomination of Mr. Slash-and-Burn Bisignano is DOGE by another name."

"Donald Trump and Republicans know they can't admit they want to kill Social Security outright, so instead they're choosing another method: strangulation. Office closures, delays, mass layoffs, trouble over the phone, trouble over email. Bisignano would bring even more strangulation," Schumer said before the vote. "If Mr. Bisignano is confirmed, Senate Republicans will own all of the chaos he creates at the Social Security Administration."

SEE ALL
U.S. President Donald Trump
News

Trump Cabinet Members Regurgitate Lies About Work Requirements

Top Trump administration officials took to the pages of The New York Times on Wednesday to champion the idea of work requirements as Republican lawmakers attempt to impose such mandates on recipients of Medicaid and federal nutrition assistance—an effort that could result in millions losing benefits.

The new op-ed was authored by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, and Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner.

The Cabinet members endorsed "efforts to require able-bodied adults (defined as adults who have not been certified as physically or mentally unfit to work), with some exceptions, to get jobs" and urged Congress to "enact common-sense reforms into law."

Alarmingly, the Trump administration officials pointed to Clinton-era welfare reform as a model for "successful" policy change. They neglect to mention that extreme poverty more than doubled in the wake of the 1996 overhaul.

"The good news is that history shows us that work requirements work," the officials wrote.

Research and state-level experiments with work requirements belie that claim. Journalist Bryce Covert noted in response to the administration officials' op-ed that "there have been many, many studies on the impacts of work requirements—both in the 90s and today—and the clear consensus is that they deprive people of benefits without increasing employment."

One study of Arkansas' brief implementation of Medicaid work requirements during the first Trump administration found "no evidence that the policy succeeded in its stated goal of promoting work and instead found substantial evidence of harm to healthcare coverage and access."

A recent review of the literature on Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) work requirements similarly concluded that "the best evidence shows they do not increase employment."

That didn't stop congressional Republicans from making work requirements a centerpiece of their proposed cuts to Medicaid and SNAP. The GOP's proposed work requirements for Medicaid recipients—most of whom already work if they are able to—account for over $300 billion of the bill's projected spending cuts to the program over the next decade.

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) said Tuesday that the Republican plans for SNAP and Medicaid would put millions of people at risk of losing benefits, in large part due to the administrative red tape that work requirements and reporting mandates inevitably bring.

The group cited research showing that "many people who lose SNAP are working or should have qualified for an exemption, but the bureaucratic red tape made documenting their employment or proving their exemption too difficult."

On Wednesday, Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.) released a report examining the impacts of Medicaid work requirements in Arkansas and Georgia.

"These two case studies are a cautionary tale," the report found. "They show that work reporting requirements are not effective. Instead of getting more people working, they simply kick people off their healthcare, many of whom were already working full-time."

In a statement, Warnock said research "shows that the best way to create jobs and grow the economy is to remove bureaucratic red tape that keeps working people from accessing healthcare."

"Instead, Washington politicians are ignoring clear data and forcing reporting requirements on working Americans as a cynical ploy to kick working people off their healthcare," said Warnock. "All of this so they can fund a tax cut for the ultra-wealthy."

SEE ALL
Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.)
News

'Gift-Wrapped Favor to Big Tech': GOP Sneakily Pushes Ban on State AI Regulation

A provision that U.S. House Republicans added to the budget reconciliation bill—unrelated to the GOP's goal of slashing Medicaid access in the legislation—represents, as one journalist said, "one of the most radical positions Republicans have taken" thus far on artificial intelligence and the regulations that experts have demanded in order to ensure the technology is used safely.

U.S. Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.) added the language Sunday night ahead of a markup session Tuesday, in what appeared to be an effort to stop state governments from enforcing existing and proposed laws to protect the public from AI systems.

"No state or political subdivision thereof may enforce any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this act," reads the provision.

With Congress "captured by Big Tech," saidAmerica 2.0 publisher and editor Dave Troy, "states are the only ones who can even try to regulate AI in the U.S."—but that would change under Guthrie's proposed ban.

"Now that state laws are finally starting to hold AI companies accountable for deepfake child pornography, election disinformation, AI companions targeting minors, and algorithmic abuse, Congress wants to slam the brakes?"

Under the law, state governments could be barred from using federal funds to develop oversight for AI or support any initiatives that differ from the Trump administration's stance on AI, which was on display earlier this year when President Donald Trump issued an order revoking the Biden administration's executive action to ensure the "safe, secure, and trustworthy development" of the technology.

Laws like one passed in New York in 2021 mandating bias audits for AI tools used in hiring decisions; a law in California requiring healthcare providers to disclose their use of generative AI; and another California measure that would require AI developers to document the data they use to create trainings—which could crack down on AI firms that hide their use of copyrighted material—could all be rendered unenforceable by Guthrie's proposal.

At 404 Media, Emanuel Maiberg wrote that "the AI industry has been sucking up to Trump since before he got into office," with tech mogul Elon Musk leading the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, Silicon Valley investor David Sacks appointed "AI czar," and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman appearing with Trump in January as he unveiled an AI data center development plan.

The inclusion of the AI provision in the budget reconciliation bill could limit debate on the proposal.

The House Committee on Energy and Commerce, which is chaired by Guthrie, held a full committee markup of the bill, including the AI language, on Tuesday. Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), who sits on the panel and is the ranking member of the Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade Subcommittee, called the provision "a giant gift to Big Tech."

"This ban will allow AI companies to ignore consumer privacy protections, let deepfakes spread, and allow companies to profile and deceive consumers using AI," said Schakowsky.

The Tech Oversight Project called on Democratic lawmakers to "stand firm" against the "AI poison-pill spending bill."

Allowing the "unhinged, dangerous" measure to pass, said Public Citizen's Big Tech accountability advocate, JB Branch, would be "an outrageous abdication of congressional responsibility and a gift-wrapped favor to Big Tech that leaves consumers vulnerable to exploitation and abuse."

"States across the country, red and blue alike, have taken bold, bipartisan action to protect their citizens," said Branch. "Now that state laws are finally starting to hold AI companies accountable for deepfake child pornography, election disinformation, AI companions targeting minors, and algorithmic abuse, Congress wants to slam the brakes? This isn't leadership, it is surrendering to corporate overreach and abuse under the guise of 'protecting American innovation.'"

In the 2025 legislative session, lawmakers in at least 45 states and Puerto Rico have introduced at least 550 AI-related bills. In at least eight states proposals have focused on regulating high-risk AI systems and preventing discrimination by algorithms, and at least 19 state legislatures are considering legislation to stop corporate landlords from fixing rental prices via algorithm.

"Congress must ask itself: Will it stand with Big Tech lobbyists, or with the people it was elected to represent?" said Branch. "Because millions of constituents across the country are currently protected by state laws that would be gutted under this proposal. Public Citizen urges lawmakers to strike this reckless preemption language from the reconciliation bill and commit to advancing federal AI legislation that builds on, not bulldozes, state-level progress."

SEE ALL
Palestinians line up to receive food from charity groups
News

'Children Are Being Starved By Design': All of Gaza Faces Hunger Crisis Due to Israeli Siege

Data released Monday shows the total Israeli siege that's now in its third month has made Gaza's already dire hunger crisis worse, leaving the entire Palestinian enclave in emergency conditions and hundreds of thousands at risk of starvation as much of the international community looks on, tunes out, or actively fuels the disaster.

The new Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) report places 244,000 people in Gaza in Phase 5, defined as such "an extreme deprivation of food" that "starvation, death, destitution, and extremely critical levels of acute malnutrition are or will likely be evident."

The entirety of the Gaza Strip, according to the IPC, is in Phase 4, where households "have large food consumption gaps which are reflected in very high acute malnutrition and excess mortality."

"Goods indispensable for people's survival are either depleted or expected to run out in the coming weeks," the report states. "The entire population is facing high levels of acute food insecurity, with half a million people (one in five) facing starvation."

"With the announced expansion of military operations throughout the Gaza Strip," the report adds, "the persistent inability of humanitarian agencies to access populations in dire need, an anticipated escalation in hostilities, and the continued mass displacement of people, the risk of Famine in the Gaza Strip is not just possible—it is increasingly likely."

Kate Phillips-Barrasso, vice president of global policy and advocacy at Mercy Corps, said the IPC data is "horrifying" but "tragically not surprising," with everyone from children to the elderly suffering.

"This catastrophe did not unfold in the dark; it happened in plain sight," said Phillips-Barrasso. "After more than two months of total blockade, Gaza's food system has collapsed, humanitarian operations are paralyzed, and people are starving. Families are in pure survival mode—hungry, exhausted, and displaced."

"The international community must act now to open the crossings and deliver lifesaving aid. We cannot stand by while an entire population is starved in plain sight."

The updated IPC figures came amid increasingly desperate warnings from aid groups operating in Gaza, most of which has been decimated by Israel's U.S.-backed military assault.

Last week, World Central Kitchen announced that it "no longer has the supplies to cook meals or bake bread in Gaza," pointing to Israel's closure of border crossings and total shutdown of humanitarian aid deliveries in March. Some aid meant for the strip has been left to rot due to Israel's blockade.

"By constantly adapting over the past weeks, we were cooking 133,000 meals daily at our two remaining WCK Field Kitchens and baking 80,000 loaves of bread each day," the aid group said. "But we have now reached the limits of what is possible."

In addition to cutting off deliveries of humanitarian supplies, the Israeli military has continued its attacks on food distribution facilities inside Gaza, further complicating efforts to aid the enclave's starving population. United Nations officials, human rights groups, and the International Criminal Court have accused Israeli leaders of using starvation as a weapon of war in Gaza.

Ahmad Alhendawi, a regional director at Save the Children, said in a statement Monday that "this is a deliberate humanitarian catastrophe."

"Children are being starved by design under Israeli authorities' total siege," said Alhendawi. "We have the food, we have the aid, and we know how to treat malnutrition in children—what we don't have is access. There is food, water, and medical aid ready to go, but it's being blocked at the border while families are forced to eat animal feed and leaves, taking unimaginable and dehumanizing measures to survive."

"This is not a crisis of supply; it's a crisis of access," Alhendawi stressed. "At any given moment in Gaza, a child, someone's whole world, could be killed by bombs and bullets, starvation and disease. The international community must act now to open the crossings and deliver lifesaving aid. We cannot stand by while an entire population is starved in plain sight."

SEE ALL