It’s not enough to be outraged. We must fight back.

It’s not enough to be outraged. We must fight back.

What we’re seeing right now is an all-out attack on democracy taken straight out of the same authoritarian playbook used by rising autocrats throughout history. We’ve seen it all before, and we know where it all leads – unless enough people of goodwill stand up and speak out.

Our journalism is committed to cataloging Trump’s outrages and connecting the dots to show people how everything fits together and what they can do to fight back.

Everything we care about is in danger, and Common Dreams is fighting back by exposing their lies and corruption and lifting up the voices of those working to stop them. If you believe in our work, we need you now more than ever. Your gift of any amount helps support our independent and fiercely unafraid journalism.

It’s not enough to be outraged. We must fight back.

Our journalism is committed to cataloging Trump’s outrages and connecting the dots to show people how everything fits together and what they can do to fight back.

Opinion
Climate
Economy
Politics
Rights & Justice
War & Peace
Embroidered Molotov cocktail on Balmar's Facebook page.
Further

The Observance It Deserves

Which is more astounding: That a right-wing yahoo got into and set ablaze the home of Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro and his wife and four kids, or that an orange madman - who assails both those who vandalize cars and those who oppose killing brown children as "domestic terrorists" - stayed silent on the attempted murder of a Jewish governor's family, all while vowing to "look to Christ's love" even "in life’s most difficult moments," presumably like when your house is burning down. Tough call.

In a Sunday press conference, officials said Gov. Shapiro and his family were evacuated early that morning after an apparent arson attack that caused "a significant amount of damage" to the Governor’s Residence in Harrisburg. Shapiro posted that he and his family were asleep at about 2 a.m. when they were awakened by state police and fire officials banging on their door. The fire struck the part of the residence where, hours before, the family had held a Seder dinner to mark the first night of Passover; Shapiro posted a photo wishing, "Happy Passover From the Shapiro family's Seder table to yours." The family was asleep in a different area, and they all escaped uninjured.

By Sunday night, officials had arrested suspect Cody Balmer, 38. They said he'd "targeted" the home, evaded troopers on duty, jumped a fence, and tossed a "home-made incendiary device" inside; he told police if he'd encountered Shapiro, he planned to beat him with a hammer. Balmer reportedly has a long criminal record, his last known residence was condemned in 2022, and a venomous Facebook page reveals his seething hatred for women and Biden - "Biden supporters shouldn't exist" - a fondness for guns, and support for Trump based on low gas prices. He seems nice. The investigation is ongoing, but officials say charges will include attempted homicide, terrorism, aggravated arson and aggravated assault on an enumerated person.

The attack comes amidst rising political violence regularly denounced by politicians including Shapiro - "It is not okay, and it has to stop" - and yet both tacitly and brazenly fomented, since the days of "good people on both sides," by a complicit Mobster-In-Chief; says one sage, "Trump's fingerprints are all over this." Critics note that Trump and Attorney General Blondie Bondi have been quick to condemn any small actions of good will they happen to disagree with - from protesting or vandalizing Teslas to speaking up on college campuses against starving and killing children in Gaza - as "anti-Semitism," "hate crimes" or "domestic terrorism," all while amassing troops at the border and disappearing "criminal aliens" as perps and terrorists though most are simply seeking safety.

So it was that, even past midnight Sunday, the witch-hunted, hoax-targeted, anti-anti-Semitic guy who wants to "protect" America's women and white people and riches from "domestic terrorism" - while mocking and dismissing attacks on Gretchen Whitmer, Paul Pelosi, the seat of democracy itself - had still said not a word about some random bigot trying to burn a Jewish elected official and his family out of their home. Note to mob boss: The "terrorists" and "anti-Semites" are not the righteous students protesting the deaths of innocent Gazan women and children; they are the arsonists trying to burn families as they sleep on the first night of Passover, which celebrates liberation from oppression. Terror, clearly, resides in the jaundiced eye of the beholder.

Instead, in the kick-off for his new "Faith Office," Trump issued a Palm Sunday message, renewing his promise to "defend the Christian faith" against the "appalling" likes of (devout Catholic) Biden, who planned 2024's Transgender Day of Visibility on Easter as part of his "years-long assault on the Christian faith." Not so for our new Man of the Gospel who doesn't know any of it. "We will never waver in safeguarding the right to religious liberty," he wrote, calling on "Christ’s love, humility, and obedience." His White House has also promised "an extraordinary Holy Week" to honor Easter with "the observance it deserves." No details yet, but the plans evidently include deporting several more brown-skinned college students for setting fire to Gov. Shapiro's home.

Balmer photo on Facebook pageFacebook

SEE ALL
Emissions are seen from a smoke stack at the Phillips 66 Refinery
News

'This Executive Order is Illegal': Trump Attacks Half-Century of Environmental Protections in One Fell Swoop

Numerous environmental protection groups were preparing to file lawsuits Friday after President Donald Trump directed federal agencies to repeal what he called "unlawful regulations" aimed at protecting the public from pollution, oil spills, and other harms—sharply curtailing the process through which rules are changed as he ordered agencies to "sunset" major regulations.

The order was issued a week-and-a-half before the deadline set by another presidential action in February, when Trump required agencies to identify "unconstitutional" and "unlawful" regulations for elimination or modification within 60 days.

Those restrictions, under Wednesday evening's order, can be repealed without being subject to a typical notice-and-comment period.

Trump named the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Energy, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement among several agencies affected by the order, and listed more than two dozen laws containing regulations that must incorporate a sunset provision for no later than September 30, 2025.

The laws include the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act of 1987, and the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982.

Hans Kristensen, director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists, suggested the order was Trump's latest push to benefit corporate polluters.

Brett Hartl, government affairs director for the Center for Biological Diversity, said it was "beyond delusional" for Trump to attempt to repeal "every environmental safeguard enacted over the past 50 years with an executive order."

"Trump's farcical directive aims to kill measures that protect endangered whales, prevent oil spills, and reduce the risk of a nuclear accident," said Hartl. "This chaotic administration is obviously desperate to smash through every environmental guardrail that protects people or preserves wildlife, but steps like this will be laughed out of court."

In a memo, the White House wrote that "in effectuating repeals of facially unlawful regulations, agency heads shall finalize rules without notice and comment, where doing so is consistent with the 'good cause' exception in the Administrative Procedure Act."

"That exception allows agencies to dispense with notice-and-comment rulemaking when that process would be 'impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest,'" said the White House.

As climate advocates scoffed at the suggestion that regulating nuclear power and pollution-causing energy infrastructure is "contrary to the public interest," legal experts questioned the legality of Trump's order.

"If this action were upheld, it would be a significant change to the way regulation is typically done, which is through notice and comment," Roger Nober, director of George Washington University's Regulatory Studies Center, toldGovernment Executive. "If the agencies determine that a rule is contrary to the Supreme Court's current jurisprudence, then [this order says they] have good cause to remove it and [they] can get around notice and comment. That's certainly an untested and untried way of implementing the Administrative Procedure Act."

Georgetown University law professor William Buzbee toldThe Hill that the Supreme Court "has repeatedly reaffirmed that agencies seeking to change a policy set forth in a regulation have to go through a new notice-and-comment proceeding for each regulation, offer 'good reasons' for the change, and address changing facts and reliance interests developed in light of the earlier regulation."

"Adding a sunset provision without going through a full notice-and-comment proceedings for each regulation to be newly subject to a sunset provision seems intended to skirt the vetting and public accountability required by consistency doctrine," he said. "Like many other attempted regulatory shortcuts of the first and second Trump administration, this [executive order] seems likely to prompt legally vulnerable agency actions."

Public Citizen co-president Lisa Gilbert suggested that the executive order is the latest example of Trump's push to govern the U.S. as "a king."

"He cannot simply roll back regulations that protect the public without going through the legally required process," Gilbert told Government Executive. "We will challenge this blatantly unlawful deregulatory effort at every step to ensure it doesn't hurt workers, consumers, and families."

Michael Wall, chief litigation officer at the Natural Resources Defense Council, called the order "a blatant attempt to blow away hundreds of protections for the public and nature, giving polluters permission to ignore whatever is coming out of their smokestacks while developers disregard endangered species protections and Big Oil no longer heeds the reforms put in place after the Deepwater Horizon disaster."

"This executive order is illegal," he said. "Congress passed these laws, and the president's constitutional duty is to carry out those statutes; he has zero power to rewrite them."

"There's no magic wand the administration might wave to sweep away multiple rules on a White House whim," Wall added. "Any changes to the rules the president wants rescinded would have to be justified, rule by rule, with facts, evidence, and analysis specific to that rule. He cannot do this by fiat."

SEE ALL
Organic eggs on sale for $14.99 per dozen
News

Under Trump, Egg Prices Smash Record for Third Straight Month

For the third straight month, U.S retail egg prices have hit a record high, despite falling wholesale prices, no bird flu outbreaks, and President Donald Trump's campaign promises—and recent misleading claims.

On Thursday, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index (CPI) reported the average retail cost of a dozen eggs rose from $5.90 in February to $6.23 last month.

Earlier this week, Trump claimed that "eggs are down 79%" due to his administration's work, a possible reference to the wholesale price, which does not reflect retail cost due to the role that profit-hungry industrial producers and grocery cartels play in inflating prices.

Trump also said that egg prices "are going down more," a statement that contradicts not only recent trends but also his own administration's Food Price Outlook, which forecasts a 57.6% increase in egg prices for 2025, with a prediction interval of 31.1%-91.5%.

Recent record egg prices have largely been driven by an avian flu epidemic that has forced farmers to cull over 166 million birds, most of them egg-laying hens. However, no farms are currently reporting any bird flu outbreaks.

On Tuesday, Cal-Maine Foods, the nation's largest egg producer, announced quarterly profits of $509 million, more than triple its gains from a year ago. The Mississippi-based company, which produces around 20% of U.S. eggs, also enjoyed a more than 600% increase in gross profits between fiscal years 2021-23, according to the consumer advocacy group Food & Water Watch (FWW).

Yet even as its profits soared, Cal-Maine still took $42 million in federal compensation for losses due to bird flu.

Last month, the U.S. Justice Department's antitrust division launched an investigation of alleged price-fixing by the nation's largest egg producers, including Cal-Maine, which isn't even the largest recipient of avian flu-related government assistance. Versova, which operates farms in Iowa and Ohio, has been allotted more than $107 million in federal bird flu relief, The Washington Postreported Wednesday. Hillandale Farms, a Pennsylvania-based company sold last month to Global Eggs, received $53 million in avian flu-related subsidies.

"For those companies to be bailed out and then turn around and set exploitative prices, it just adds insult to injury for consumers," Thomas Gremillion, director of food policy at the Consumer Federation of America, told the Post. "Absolutely, it's unfair."

FWW research director Amanda Starbuck took aim at the corporate food system, saying Thursday that "the industry is proving itself effective at extracting enormous profits out of American consumers."

"We are all paying for it—at the store, with food shortages, and with the growing threat of the next pandemic," she continued.

"Restoring sanity to the grocery aisle will require immediate action to transform our food system," Starbuck added. "To lower egg prices, the Trump administration must take on the food monopolies, hasten and prioritize its investigation into corporate price fixing, and stop the spread of factory farms."

The fresh CPI figures weren't all bad news, as the index saw its first decline in five years, falling 0.1% mainly on the strength of lower oil prices. The 12-month increase in consumer prices also slowed from 2.8% to 2.4%.

However, the mildly positive CPI news was overshadowed by the economic uncertainty caused by Trump's mercurial global trade war, including a ramped-up 145% tariff on imports from China, one of the top U.S. trading partners, and ongoing stock market chaos.

"The only egg prices Donald Trump is lowering," Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin quipped earlier this week, "is our nest eggs."

SEE ALL
A pair of American bald eagles
News

Outrage as Trump Blows Up Endangered Species Act Protection by Redefining One Word

The Trump administration on Wednesday published an anticipated proposal that one green group warned "would rescind nearly all habitat protections for endangered species nationwide" by changing the regulatory definition of a single word in the country's cornerstone wildlife conservation law.

Two federal agencies published a proposed overhaul of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) that would rescind the definition of "harm" to plants and animals protected under the landmark 1973 legislation, which according to the U.S. Department of the Interior has saved 99% of listed species from extinction.

Under the proposal from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), habitat destruction—the leading driver of extinction—would not be considered "harm." Opponents say the Trump administration is planning the redefinition in order to enable more destructive resource extraction like logging, mining, and fossil fuel expansion that would imperil ESA-protected species.

The Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) warned that the proposal would open the door "for industries of all kinds to destroy the natural world and drive species to extinction in the process."

Noah Greenwald, CBD's co-director of endangered species, said Wednesday that U.S. President Donald Trump "is trying to drive a knife through the heart of the Endangered Species Act."

"We refuse to let him wipe out America's imperiled wildlife, and I believe the courts won't allow this radical assault on conservation," he continued. "There's just no way to protect animals and plants from extinction without protecting the places they live, yet the Trump administration is opening the flood gates to immeasurable habitat destruction."

"This administration's greed and contempt for imperiled wildlife know no bounds, but most Americans know that we destroy the natural world at our own peril," Greenwald added. "Nobody voted to drive spotted owls, Florida panthers, or grizzly bears to extinction."

CBD says the definition of harm has been "pivotal to protecting and recovering endangered species," noting that the U.S. Supreme Court has affirmed that it includes habitat destruction.

Andrew Bowman, president and CEO of Defenders of Wildlife, said Wednesday, "Despite the fact that the Endangered Species Act is America's single greatest tool to prevent species extinction, has a 99% success rate, and is supported across party lines and the country by 95% of the electorate, the Trump administration is hell-bent on destroying it to further line the pockets of industry."

"The vast majority of imperiled wildlife listed as endangered or threatened under the ESA are there because of loss of habitat," Bowman added. "This latest salvo to redefine 'harm' to eliminate protection for wildlife from habitat destruction, if successful, will further imperil threatened and endangered species. We will fight this action and continue to protect the wildlife and wild places we hold dear as a nation."

Drew Caputo, vice president of litigation for lands, wildlife, and oceans at Earthjustice, on Wednesday accused the Trump administration of "trying to rewrite basic biology."

"Like all of us, endangered species need a safe place to live," Caputo said. "This misguided new proposal threatens a half-century of progress in protecting and restoring endangered species. We are prepared to go to court to ensure that America doesn't abandon its endangered wildlife."

Trump has already attacked the ESA during his current term by issuing an executive order declaring a "national energy emergency" meant to promote his "drill, baby, drill" fossil fuel policy. The order states that the ESA and Marine Mammal Protection Act will not be allowed stand in the way of fossil fuel development.

The proposed redefinition of "harm" in the ESA comes as the Trump administration, spearheaded by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, eviscerates federal agencies including the Fish and Wildlife Service and NOAA. As he did during his first term, Trump is pursuing a massive rollback of climate and environmental regulations and has appointed Cabinet secretaries whose backgrounds and beliefs are often inimical to their agencies' purposes.

These include Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, a staunch fossil fuel proponent; Energy Secretary Chris Wright, a former CEO of a fracking company who has denied the existence of a climate emergency; and Environmental Protect Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin, described by the Sunrise Movement as "a disaster for our planet and a win for Big Oil."

In response to the administration's proposal, Sierra Club executive director Ben Jealous said that "in Donald Trump's world, future generations will know bald eagles, blue whales, grizzly bears, and other imperiled species only through photographs."

"A world with the ESA is a world where those species have a chance to thrive," he added. "We will do everything in our power to defend this law and save our wildlife for future generations."

SEE ALL
U.S. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) speaks at a rally
News

Democrats Follow Van Hollen's Lead, Planning El Salvador Trip to Bring Abrego Garcia Home

With two presidents insisting there's nothing they can do to release Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland sheet metal worker who was sent to a notorious maximum security prison in El Salvador despite a court order barring his deportation there, U.S. Sen. Chris Van Hollen on Tuesday detailed his plans to go to the Central American country to demand his constituent's safe return—and several other Democrats indicated they would follow his lead.

Van Hollen (D-Md.) announced his intention on Monday in a letter to El Salvador's ambassador to the U.S., saying he wanted to meet with Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele during his visit to Washington, D.C. this week and that if Abrego Garcia is not home "by midweek," the senator would travel to El Salvador.

On Tuesday, he told CNN that he had not heard back from Bukele regarding his request.

"I hope to meet with officials of the government of El Salvador," he said, adding that it wasn't clear whether Bukele would be in the country during his visit. "I also hope to visit this notorious prison to see Abrego Garcia... I think the situation for both the Trump administration and the president of El Salvador is unsustainable."

Van Hollen pointed to the meeting Bukele had with U.S. President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House on Monday, in which Bukele insisted he did not have the power to release Abrego Garcia and repeatedly claimed he is a "terrorist" who can't be released into the country.

Abrego Garcia entered the U.S. in 2011, and was accused by a police informant of being a member of the gang MS-13 in 2019. He has denied the allegations and has never been charged with a crime, and a judge found in 2019 that he should not be deported to his home country of El Salvador because he had a credible fear of persecution and torture there.

As The New Republicreported Tuesday, the police officer who formally accused Abrego Garcia of being a member of MS-13 was later suspended for disclosing confidential information about another case.

"All this raises more questions about the integrity of the process by which Abrego Garcia has been deemed a gang member, even as Trump and his minions have been extraordinarily cavalier in throwing around the MS-13 smear," wrote Greg Sargent.

Abrego Garcia is married to a U.S. citizen and the father of a five-year-old, and had been living and working in Maryland for almost 15 years when he was stopped by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents last month, sent to a detention center in Texas, and then expelled to El Salvador's Terrorism Confinement Center.

The Supreme Court ruled 9-0 last week that the Trump administration, which has said Abrego Garcia was expelled due to an "administrative error," is required to facilitate the man's return.

"This is an administration that has lied about Mr. Abrego Garcia," said Van Hollen on Monday. "The vice president of the United States tweeted out that he had a criminal record. That was a lie. They're just lying. They've gotten caught lying, they don't want to admit it, and they have an obligation to bring him home."

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt doubled down on claims that Abrego Garcia "is a foreign terrorist and an MS-13 gang member" on Tuesday and said that if he is returned to the U.S., the administration will ultimately deport him back to El Salvador.

On Monday, Reps. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), Maxwell Alejandro Frost (D-Fl.), and Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.) indicated that they would join Van Hollen on his trip to El Salvador. Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) is also planning to travel to the country, Axiosreported Tuesday.

"We are in a constitutional crisis," said Garcia. "The president is illegally sending people to foreign prisons. He's defying a unanimous Supreme Court decision. Congress cannot be business as usual. We need to go to El Salvador and demand the release of Kilmar Abrego Garcia."

Georgia state Rep. Ruwa Romman (D-97) was among those applauding Van Hollen's plan, and said that "a massive congressional delegation should join him with international human rights lawyers."

The Trump administration said Tuesday in its daily status update on Abrego Garcia, required by U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis, that it was "prepared to facilitate Abrego Garcia's presence in the United States in accordance with those processes if he presents at a port of entry"—but continued to claim it cannot force Bukele, who has a $6 million deal with the White House to detain suspected gang members expelled from the U.S., to release him.

Progressive commentator Hasan Piker said Van Hollen's planned trip was "absolutely the right thing to do."

"More Democrats should do things like this," he said. "Other senators should also join him."

SEE ALL
An IDF tank amid the ruins of Gaza
News

Israeli Troops Blow Whistle on War Crimes in Gaza 'Kill Zone'

An Israeli human rights group on Monday published a report in which Israel Defense Forces officers and soldiers who took part in the creation of a buffer zone along Gaza's border with Israel described alleged war crimes including indiscriminate killing, as well as the wholesale deliberate destruction of civilian infrastructure in what multiple whistleblowers called a "kill zone."

The new report from Breaking the Silence (BTS) details how Israel—which for decades has dubiously relied upon defensive buffer zones in territories it conquers or controls—decided on a policy of "widespread, deliberate destruction" in order to create a security perimeter ranging between roughly half a mile and a mile in width on the Gaza side of the Israeli-Palestinian border.

"To create this area, Israel launched a major military engineering operation that, by means of wholesale destruction, entirely reshaped about 16% of the Gaza Strip... an area previously home to some 35% of Gaza's agricultural land," the report states. "The perimeter extends from the coast in the north to the Egyptian border in the south, all within the territory of the Gaza Strip and outside of Israel's internationally recognized borders."

"The mission given to soldiers in the field, as revealed in their testimonies, was to create an empty, completely flat expanse about a kilometer wide along the Gaza side of the border fence," the publication continues. "This space was to have no crops, structures, or people. Almost every object, infrastructure installation, and structure within the perimeter was demolished."

"Palestinians were denied entry into the area altogether, a ban which was enforced using live fire, including machine gun fire and tank shells. In this way, the military created a death zone of enormous proportions," the report adds. "Places where people had lived, farmed, and established industry were transformed into a vast wasteland, a strip of land eradicated in its entirety."

"The testimonies demonstrate that soldiers were given orders to deliberately, methodically, and systematically annihilate whatever was within the designated perimeter, including entire residential neighborhoods, public buildings, educational institutions, mosques, and cemeteries, with very few exceptions," the paper says. "Industrial zones and agricultural areas which served the entire population of Gaza were laid to waste, regardless of whether those areas had any connection whatsoever to the fighting."

"Places where people had lived, farmed, and established industry were transformed into a vast wasteland."

Palestinians who dared enter the perimeter, even accidentally were also targeted, including civilian men, women, children, and elders. The officers and soldiers interviewed by BTS struggled to explain whether noncombatants were informed of the no-go zone's limits, with one saying civilians knew to stay away when they saw that "enough people died or got injured" crossing the unmarked boundary.

Some people who entered the perimeter out of sheer desperation were targeted. Israel's blockade of Gaza has fueled widespread and sometimes deadly starvation, and Palestinians entered the "kill zone" to pick hubeiza, a nutritious wild plant, after the area's farmland was razed.

"The IDF really is fulfilling the public's wishes, which state: 'There are no innocents in Gaza. We'll show them,'" one reserve warrant officer explained. "People were incriminated for having bags in their hands. Guy showed up with a bag? Incriminated, terrorist. I believe they came to pick hubeiza, but... boom," tank shells were fired at him from half a mile away.

In a separate interview with The Guardian, that same officer said that at first, his attitude toward invading Gaza was, "I went there because they killed us and now we're going to kill them."

"And I found out that we're not only killing them—we're killing them, we're killing their wives, their children, their cats, their dogs," they added. "We're destroying their houses and pissing on their graves."

Another IDF reservist officer told BTS that he was briefed that "there is no civilian population" in the area, where Palestinians are "terrorists, all of them." Asked what the area looked like after the IDF clearing operation, the officer replied: "Hiroshima."

A captain in an armored division of the IDF reserves said "the borderline is a kill zone" where "there are no clear rules of engagement" or "proper combat procedure."

"Anyone who crosses a certain line, that we have defined, is considered a threat and is sentenced to death," the captain added.

The BTS report follows an investigation published last December by Haaretz, Israel's oldest newspaper, in which IDF soldiers and veterans described a "kill zone" in the Netzarim corridor in the heart of Gaza, where troops were ordered to shoot "anyone who enters."

"The forces in the field call it 'the line of dead bodies,'" one commander said. "After shootings, bodies are not collected, attracting packs of dogs who come to eat them. In Gaza, people know that wherever you see these dogs, that's where you must not go."

The new report comes as Israeli forces are carrying out an ethnic cleansing campaign in which hundreds of thousands of Palestinians are being forcibly expelled from areas of Gaza including the south and an expanded border perimeter. The Associated Pressreported Monday that Israel "now controls more than 50% of the territory and is squeezing Palestinians into shrinking wedges of land."

Israeli troops are moving to seize large tracts of the Gaza Strip for a so-called "security zone" and Jewish recolonization. Members of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's far-right government have said the campaign is being coordinated with the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump, who in February said that the United States would "take over" Gaza, remove all of its Palestinians, and transform the Mediterranean enclave into the "Riviera of the Middle East."

On Monday, Netanyahu arrived in Washington, D.C. from Hungary for talks with Trump and other U.S. officials regarding topics including a Gaza cease-fire, release of the remaining hostages held by Hamas, Iran policy, and tariffs. Netanyahu is a fugitive from the International Criminal Court, which last year issued arrest warrants for him and former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza, including extermination and using starvation as a weapon of war.

Israel is also facing a genocide case at the International Court of Justice for its conduct in a war that has left more than 180,000 Palestinians dead, maimed, or missing in Gaza and almost all of the strip's more than 2 million people forcibly displaced—often multiple times.

Israel's bombing and invasion of Gaza continued on Monday. An early morning IDF strike on a tent where numerous journalists were sleeping outside Nasser Hospital in the southern city of Khan Younis killed Palestine Today reporter Hilmi al-Faqaawi and another man, who were burned alive as helpless witnesses were unable to douse the flames or rescue victims.

Nine others were reportedly wounded in the attack, which the IDF said targeted a Hamas member posing as a journalist. More than 230 journalists have been killed by Israeli bombs and bullets since October 2023.

SEE ALL