Mark Guiducci
The New York Post reports Vanity Fair magazine employees are mutinying at the new boss’ proposal to put first lady Melania Trump on the glossy’s cover.
As Semafor first reported, Vanity Fair editor Mark Guiducci is mulling the possibility of featuring the first lady as part of a mandate to rethink the publication’s relationship with power and celebrity, even if the move was “likely to repel [the] magazine’s liberal readers.”
However, the Daily Mail reports the magazine’s equally liberal staff are not taking the news well.
“We are not going to normalize this despot and his wife; we’re just not going to do it. We’re going to stand for what’s right,” one unidentified staffer told the Daily Mail.
"It sickens me,” another staffer said. “Even the idea of it.”
"If I have to work bagging groceries at Trader Joe's, I'll do it," said another. "If [Guiducci] puts Melania on the cover, half of the editorial staff will walk out, I guarantee it."
Still another staffer, a mid-level manager, threatened to “walk out the motherf—— door, and half my staff will follow me,' hours after Semafor reported Guiducci’s intent.
The New York Post reports other "fashion bible[s]" have been equally neglectful of Melania Trump. Former First Lady Michelle Obama appeared on Vogue’s cover three times while she occupied the White House. Jill Biden secured two covers during Joe Biden's single term in office, while Hillary Clinton was also featured on the front page in 1998.
The Daily Mail reports Melania Trump has appeared at the top of Vogue magazine in 2005 when the monthly covered her wedding to Donald Trump. She also appeared on the cover of Vanity Fair's Mexican Edition in 2017, but she has never been on the cover of the U.S. edition as first lady.
Melania Trump was offered a Vogue photo spot during her husband's first presidency but allegedly turned it down after being told it might not be a cover shoot, reports The Daily Mail.
Reprinted with permission from Alternet
Melania Trump was offered a Vogue photo spot during her husband's first presidency but allegedly turned it down after being told it might not be a cover shoot, reports The Daily Mail.
Read the full New York Post report at this link.
Report typos and corrections to: feedback@alternet.org.Do you think Trump’s influence is weakening within the Republican Party?
If the WSJ is sitting on more Epstein bombshells, it explains some thingsDiscoverTrump has relinquished the presidency — and there's only one sane responseDiscoverFriday PlansIs 87¢ Viagra Safe? (A Doctor's Surprising Answer).Read MoreSkip'They will kill you': Maxwell explains why she doesn't think Epstein died by suicideDiscoverWhat a nation under siege looks likeDiscover3-Wood Carry Distance Plus 7-Wood Accuracy In One ClubPerformanceGolf|SponsoredStill Waking Up With Puffy Eyes? This Is Likely WhyOkita Beauty Labs|SponsoredThis Special Salt Can Burn Fat Cells While You Are EatingWeightLossQuick|SponsoredNantucket: Here’s The Average Price of a 6-Hour Gutter UpgradeHomebuddy.com|SponsoredCVS Hides This $1 Generic Viagra - Here’s the Aisle It's Really In.Friday Plans|SponsoredA New Option for Choking Emergencies When Help Is Minutes AwayHeroic Daily|SponsoredRead Comments - Join the Discussion
Trump just discovered a terrifying secret weapon
'Insufferable little tyrants': MAGA'S newest 'idiotic' delusion blasted by critics
MAGA is panicking as Trump finally meets his match

Do you think Trump’s influence is weakening within the Republican Party?

'Losing it': Trump family member says Trump’s rooftop jaunt shows 'cognitive decline'

'Just a show': CNN takedown shows Trump claim about red states is 'not based on the data'

Trump just discovered a terrifying secret weapon

Trump officials are promising 'explosive secrets' — but it’s all an act: ex-DOJ prosecutor

'Most illegal': Judges 'absolutely flabbergasted' by Trump’s 'overreach'

Voters who fueled Trump in 2024 'will not be there in 2026': CNN senior analyst

'Tool of politics': DOJ alumni rip Trump appointee for violating department 'protocols'

'We didn’t hear it there': Fox News host tries and fails to prove Trump’s claim

'Spiraling': Ex-Trump staffers say newest Epstein comments make him look 'really guilty'
BRAND NEW STORIES'Walk out the door': Vanity Fair staffers revolt over effort to 'normalize' Melania Trump
'We didn’t hear it there': Fox News host tries and fails to prove Trump’s claim
Voters who fueled Trump in 2024 'will not be there in 2026': CNN senior analyst
'You have to stop it': Fox News raging over CA gov’s sold-out 'Trump Bible' troll
Not 'a single Trump voter in favor of this': MAGA explodes at latest reversal
'Most illegal': Judges 'absolutely flabbergasted' by Trump’s 'overreach'
MOST POPULAR'Sick of all the lies': Missouri farmer erupts at GOP rep for backing 'dictator' Trump
Newsom fires back after Trump vows DOJ lawsuit against new California maps
'Insufferable little tyrants': MAGA'S newest 'idiotic' delusion blasted by critics
'A dangerous message': Retired general blasts Trump admin in scathing op-ed
'Mass is a big deal': Have are 6 wild moments from rambling Trump presser
MAGA is panicking as Trump finally meets his match
How the worst memo in history gave us the disaster that is President Donald Trump
'Withdrawn': GOP senator jolts MAGA by saying Trump DOJ pick lacks votes for confirmation
A truly terrifying plot lies hidden in this empty Trump threat
'Desperately need these services': Conservative mom blames GOP for cutting son’s Medicaid
Trending Topics- george conway
- noam chomsky
- civil war
- Kayleigh mcenany
- Melania trump
- drudge report
- paul krugman
- Lindsey graham
- Lincoln project
- al franken bill maher
- People of praise
- Ivanka trump
- eric trump
Start your day with National Memo Newsletter
Know first.
The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning
Bill Pulte
Donald Trump is threatening to fire Lisa Cook, a member of the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors, over allegations that she made false claims on mortgage applications before she went to the Fed.
I am not going to lead with a discussion of what Cook may or may not have done. That would be playing Trump’s game. Clearly, he’s just looking for a pretext to fire someone who isn’t a loyalist — and who happens, surprise, to be a black woman. If you write about politics and imagine that Trump cares about mortgage fraud — or for that matter believe anything Trump officials say about the affair without independent confirmation — you should find a different profession. Maybe you should go into agricultural field work, to help offset the labor shortages created by Trump’s deportations.
The real story here isn’t about Cook, or mortgages. It’s about the way the Trump administration is weaponizing government against political opponents, critics, or anyone it finds inconvenient.
You should think about the attack on Cook in the same context as mortgage fraud accusations made against California Senator Adam Schiff and New York Attorney General Letitia James. Or you should look at the attacks on Jerome Powell, the Federal Reserve chair, over the cost of renovations at the Fed’s headquarters. Or the still mysterious raid on the house of John Bolton, who at one time was Trump’s national security adviser.
The message here clearly isn’t “Don’t commit fraud,” which would be laughable coming from Donald Trump, of all people. Nor, despite what some commentators have said, is it all about revenge — although Trump is, indeed, a remarkably vindictive person. But mainly it’s about intimidation: “If you get in our way we will ruin your life.”
As with individuals, so with institutions. Universities are being threatened with loss of research grants unless they take orders from the White House. Law firms are being threatened with loss of access unless they do pro-bono work on behalf of the administration. Corporations are being threatened with punitive tariffs unless they support administration policies — and, in the case of Intel, hand over part ownership of the company.
This newsletter usually focuses on economics, and I could go on at length about the ways rule by intimidation will hurt the economy. There’s a whole economics literature devoted to the costs when an economy is dominated by “rent-seeking” — when business success depends on political connections rather than producing things people want. I’ve been writing a series of primers on stagflation. One of the way things could go very badly wrong would be politicization of the Federal Reserve, with monetary policy dictated by Trump’s whims, and it would be even worse if Fed policy is driven by officials’ fear of what will happen if they don’t follow Trump’s orders.
It's also important to realize that the Fed does more than set interest rates. It’s also an important regulator of the financial system, a job that will be deeply compromised if Fed governors can be bullied by personal threats.
But there’s much more at stake here than the economy. What we’re witnessing is the authoritarian playbook in action. Tyrannies don’t always get their way by establishing a secret police force that arrests people at will — although we’re getting that too. Much of their power comes not from overt violence but from their ability to threaten people’s careers and livelihoods, up to and including trumped-up accusations of criminal behavior.
Which brings me, finally, to the accusations against Lisa Cook. According to Bill Pulte, the ultra-MAGA director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, Cook applied for mortgages on two properties, claiming both as her primary residence. This isn’t allowed, because banks offer more favorable mortgage terms on your primary residence than on investment properties.
Borrowers do sometimes commit deliberate fraud, claiming multiple properties as their primary residence when they always intended to rent them out. For example, Ken Paxton, Texas’s Attorney General, claimed three houses as his primary residence, renting out two of them, and has also rented out at least two properties that he listed as vacation homes. Somehow, however, Pulte hasn’t highlighted his case, let alone threatened him with a 30-year prison sentence.
The truth is that even when clear mortgage fraud has taken place, it almost always leads to an out-of-court settlement, with fees paid to the lender, rather than a criminal case. In 2024, only 38 people in America were sentenced for mortgage fraud. No, I’m not missing some zeroes.
So did Cook say something false on her mortgage applications? Pulte says so, but I’d wait for verification. Also, false statements on mortgage applications are only a crime if they’re made knowingly, which is a high bar. And nothing at all about this story is relevant to Cook’s role at the Federal Reserve. If the administration thinks it has enough evidence to bring charges, it should bring charges, not demand that she quit her job.
The important thing to understand is that we are all Lisa Cook. You may imagine that your legal and financial history is so blameless that there’s no way MAGA can come after you. If you believe that, you’re living in a fantasy world. Criticize them or get in their way, and you will become a target.
Paul Krugman is a Nobel Prize-winning economist and former professor at MIT and Princeton who now teaches at the City University of New York's Graduate Center. From 2000 to 2024, he wrote a column for The New York Times. Please consider subscribing to his Substack.
Reprinted with permission from Substack.
- Meet the Trump housing official leading probes into the president's ... ›
- Updated list of Bill Pulte's actions that impact FHFA, GSEs ›
- Trump calls on Federal Reserve official to resign after ally accuses ... ›
- Fed's Lisa Cook says she will not resign over mortgage fraud claims ›
- What to know about Bill Pulte, Trump regulator going after Fed officials ›