Share

Section 10 of Births and Deaths Registration Act 'impairs dignity of unmarried fathers' - ConCourt

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
Section 10 of Births and Deaths Registration Act has been declared unconstitutional.
Section 10 of Births and Deaths Registration Act has been declared unconstitutional.
Getty Images
  • The Constitutional Court has declared a section of the Births and Deaths Registration Act unconstitutional.
  • The section does not allow an unmarried father to register his child's birth under his surname, unless the mother gives consent or is present.
  • A ConCourt judge says there is no justification for differentiating between married and unmarried fathers.

The Constitutional Court has declared section 10 of the Births and Deaths Registration Act - which does not allow an unmarried father to register his child's birth under his surname, unless the mother is present or gives consent - unconstitutional. 

In a judgment by Justice Margaret Victor on Wednesday, which was read out by Justice Steven Majiedt, the court found there was no justification for differentiating between married and unmarried fathers.

"Section 10 of the act impairs the dignity of unmarried fathers, whose bonds with their children are deemed less worthy than the children of married parents," Majiedt said. 

READ | 6 father-daughter relationships we love

The apex court confirmed a 2020 ruling by the Eastern Cape High Court, which found the act invalid and inconsistent.

Father Menzile Lawrence Naki approached the court after the Department of Home Affairs refused to register his child under his surname because the mother was an undocumented Democratic Republic of Congo national.

Consent

The department would also not allow him to register the birth, without the mother's consent.

Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng was one of two dissenting justices. He acknowledged that the act discriminated against unmarried fathers, but held the discrimination was reasonable, justifiable and fair. 

"The chief justice holds that children are vulnerable and their best interests are of paramount importance in issues that concern them have to be addressed.

"The chief justice further reasons that they must be protected and not exposed to the risks of being easily claimed and adopted by people, whose relationship with them or subsequently to be in their lives, has been established," said Majiedt.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Voting Booth
Are you aware that there will be three ballots for the general elections this year?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes - and I know how each ballot works
49% - 1074 votes
I had no idea - let me read up on it
16% - 351 votes
I am somewhat aware, but I'm not 100% confident on what each one is for
35% - 775 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
18.08
+0.5%
Rand - Pound
22.98
+0.5%
Rand - Euro
19.62
+0.6%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.05
+0.6%
Rand - Yen
0.12
+0.5%
Platinum
1,053.27
+0.2%
Palladium
1,028.97
+0.0%
Gold
2,421.57
-0.2%
Silver
31.83
+0.4%
Brent Crude
83.71
-0.3%
Top 40
73,439
-0.4%
All Share
79,808
-0.3%
Resource 10
64,263
-0.8%
Industrial 25
110,205
-0.4%
Financial 15
17,322
+0.0%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE