Share

All alcohol equal? Wine court case on ice after unbanning of liquor sales

0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
  • Saai intends to ask the court to postpone its application to have the ban on wine sales declared unlawful indefinitely.
  • This after government moved the country to lockdown level 2, meaning alcohol can legally be sold.
  • One of the questions before court was whether wine should be treated differently to other types of alcohol.  

After government lifted the ban on alcohol sales, the Southern African Agri Initiative's (Saai) court application will not proceed as planned.

The AfriForum-aligned Saai and their co-applicants, which included wine farms and other wine industry bodies, asked the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria to declare unlawful, invalid and unconstitutional the regulations prohibiting the sale and transport of wine.

The nub of their case was that government should have considered the wine industry when it decided to reinstate the prohibition on alcohol sales and transportation.

READ | The time was right to alleviate hardships - Dlamini-Zuma on Level 2 regulations

Cooperative Government and Traditional Affairs Minister Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma responded that there was no evidence that wine was different to other types of alcohol and to treat it as such would not serve the purpose of why the ban was imposed in the first place.

Saai hit back, saying that Dlamini-Zuma "has merely assumed that all alcohol is equal".

Matter

This matter was set down to be heard by a full bench on 24 August.

Then, on Saturday evening, President Cyril Ramaphosa announced that the country would enter lockdown Level 2 on Tuesday, which meant that alcohol could be sold and consumed on-premises under certain limitations. On Monday, Dlamini-Zuma announced the new regulations.

READ | Smokers rejoice as tobacco ban is lifted

In a statement published on its website on Tuesday, Saai said before the new regulations, Dlamini-Zuma's legal team, on Sunday, asked them to withdraw the case.  

"Saai refused to have the case struck from the roll in view of the minister's previous promulgation of regulations in contrast with the president's speeches. To Saai it was of cardinal importance to have the wording of the Level 2 regulations studied by its legal team before making any decision," it said in a statement.  

Saai said in "light of the lifting of the draconian ban on wine sales" it intended postponing the application against Dlamini-Zuma indefinitely.

A court order was expected by the end of the week

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Voting Booth
What do you think of the DA's controversial TV ad depicting a burning South African flag?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Effective - they hit the nail on the head
80% - 2380 votes
Tone-deaf - they crossed the line
20% - 586 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
18.37
+0.3%
Rand - Pound
23.08
+0.1%
Rand - Euro
19.82
+0.2%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.14
+0.3%
Rand - Yen
0.12
+0.7%
Platinum
1,001.78
-0.4%
Palladium
964.12
-1.8%
Gold
2,337.04
-1.0%
Silver
28.24
+0.3%
Brent Crude
82.79
-1.3%
Top 40
72,408
+0.3%
All Share
78,687
+0.3%
Resource 10
62,807
-1.0%
Industrial 25
109,320
+0.7%
Financial 15
17,029
+0.4%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE